<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="part2stratml.xsl"?>
<PerformancePlanOrReport xmlns="urn:ISO:std:iso:17469:tech:xsd:PerformancePlanOrReport" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"

 xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ISO:std:iso:17469:tech:xsd:PerformancePlanOrReport http://stratml.us/references/PerformancePlanOrReport20160216.xsd" Type="Strategic_Plan"><Name>Power &amp; Progress: Redirecting Technology</Name><Description/><OtherInformation>The goals and objectives outlined in this StratML rendition are taken from pages 383 - 420 of the book Power and Progress, co-authored by Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson.</OtherInformation><StrategicPlanCore><Organization><Name>Public Affairs</Name><Acronym>PA</Acronym><Identifier>_428b502c-4945-11ee-950f-79af1083ea00</Identifier><Description>Perseus Books, LLC, a subsidiary of Hachette Book Group, Inc.</Description><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Daron Acemoglu</Name><Description>Co-Author ~ Daron Acemoglu is Institute Professor of Economics at MIT, the university’s highest faculty honor. For the last twenty-five years, he has been researching the historical origins of prosperity, poverty, and the effects of new technologies on economic growth, employment, and inequality. Acemoglu is the recipient of several awards and honors, including the John Bates Clark Medal, awarded to economists under forty judged to have made the most significant contribution to economic thought and knowledge (2005); the BBVA Frontiers of Knowledge Award in economics, finance, and management for his lifetime contributions (2016), and the Kiel Institute's Global Economy Prize in economics (2019). He is author (with James Robinson) of The Narrow Corridor and the New York Times bestseller Why Nations Fail.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Simon Johnson</Name><Description>Co-Author ~ Simon Johnson is the Kurtz Professor of Entrepreneurship at MIT and a former chief economist to the IMF. His much-viewed opinion pieces have appeared in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Financial Times, the Atlantic, and elsewhere. With law professor James Kwak, Simon is the co-author of the bestsellers 13 Bankers and White House Burning and a founder of the widely-cited economics blog The Baseline Scenario.</Description></Stakeholder></Organization><Vision><Description>The welfare of all people is maximized</Description><Identifier>_428b516c-4945-11ee-950f-79af1083ea00</Identifier></Vision><Mission><Description>To redirect the development and usage of technology for the greater benefit of society at large</Description><Identifier>_428b523e-4945-11ee-950f-79af1083ea00</Identifier></Mission><Value><Name>Utilitarianism</Name><Description>maximizing the combined welfare of all people in society (p. 2)</Description></Value><Value><Name>Science</Name><Description>Scientific inquiry is cumulative, with inventors building on each other's work... Today, scientific discoveries travel at lightning speed, especially when there is a pressing need. (p. 23)</Description></Value><Value><Name>Vision</Name><Description>Vision shapes our choices because it specifies what our aspirations are, what means we pursue to achieve them, what alternatives we will consider and which ones we ignore, and how we perceive the costs and benefits of our actions. (p. 24)</Description></Value><Value><Name>Innovation</Name><Description>A shared vision among innovators is critical for the accumulation of knowledge and is also central to how we use technology. (p. 24)</Description></Value><Value><Name>Technology</Name><Description>... everything we do to shape our surroundings and organize production. (p. 10)  Techologies do not exist independent of an underlying vision. (p. 25)</Description></Value><Value><Name>Power</Name><Description>Economic and political institutions shape who has the best opportunities to persuade others... Persuasion power is more potent if you have a compelling idea ... But ... that ... depends partly on institutions... Social status is conferred by society's norms and institutions... Social status ... reinforces other power inequities. (p. 87)</Description></Value><Value><Name>Agency</Name><Description>History is not destiny. People have "agency" -- they can make social, political, and economic choices ... we can ... refashion whose opinions are valued and listened to and who sets the agenda. (p. 88)</Description></Value><Goal><Name>Narrative &amp; Norms</Name><Description>Alter the narrative and change norms</Description><Identifier>_428b52fc-4945-11ee-950f-79af1083ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/><Objective><Name>Digital Technologies</Name><Description>Make digital technologies useful to humans and boost productivity </Description><Identifier>_428b53c4-4945-11ee-950f-79af1083ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Corporations</Name><Description>Our current problems are rooted in the enormous economic, political, and social power of corporations, especially in the tech industry.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Tech Industry</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Investors</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Companies</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Large Investors</Name><Description>Large investors can demand transparency.</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>The concentrated power of business undercuts shared prosperity because it limits the sharing of gains from technological change.  But its most pernicious impact is via the direction of technology, which is moving excessively toward automation, surveillance, data collection, and advertising... Choices over the direction of technology should be part of the criteria that investors use for evaluating companies and their effects. (p. 393)  ... digital technologies can complement humans by:</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Productivity</Name><Description>Improve the productivity of workers in their current jobs</Description><Identifier>_e5492a54-4b85-11ee-a4d8-bf82f682ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.1.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Workers</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Tasks</Name><Description>Create new tasks with the help of machine intelligence augmenting human capabilities</Description><Identifier>_e5492dba-4b85-11ee-a4d8-bf82f682ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.1.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Information</Name><Description>Provide better, more useful information for human decision making</Description><Identifier>_e5492f2c-4b85-11ee-a4d8-bf82f682ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.1.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Platforms</Name><Description>Build new platforms that bring together people with different skills and needs</Description><Identifier>_e54930a8-4b85-11ee-a4d8-bf82f682ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.1.4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Teachers</Name><Description>For example, digital and AI technologies can increase effectiveness of classroom instruction by providing new tools and better information to teachers. (p. 394)</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Innovation</Name><Description>Encourage the development of technologies that compement and help human capabilities</Description><Identifier>_e5493206-4b85-11ee-a4d8-bf82f682ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Society</Name><Description>Society and government must work together to achieve this objective.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Government</Name><Description>However, govenment cannot be the nerve center of innovation, and bureaucrats are not going to design algorithms or come up with new products.</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Diverse innovation stragegies are also important because automation is not harmful in and of itself... The problem is an unbalanced portfolio of innovations that excesively prioritize automation and surveillance, failing to create new tasks and opportunities for workers.  Redirecting technology ... can ... encourage the development of technologies that compement and help human capabilities. (p. 395)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Framework &amp; Incentives</Name><Description>Institute a framework and incentives to induce the private sector to move away from excessive automation and surveillance and toward more worker-friendly technologies</Description><Identifier>_e5493378-4b85-11ee-a4d8-bf82f682ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.2.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Government</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Private Sector</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>China</Name><Description>... a serious redirection in the West can powerfully influence Chinese investment as well. (p. 396)</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>What is needed is the right institutional framework and incentives shaped by government policies, bolstered by a constructive narrative, to induce the private sector to move away from excessive automation and surveillance, and toward more worker-friendly technologies. (p. 395)</OtherInformation></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Powers</Name><Description>Cultivate countervailing powers</Description><Identifier>_428b5482-4945-11ee-950f-79af1083ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Worker Organizations</Name><Description>Labor unions have been the mainstay of countervailing powers since the beginning of the industrial age... The provided camaraderie for people working together on similar tasks... Workplaces have become much less concentrated and more diverse, so camaraderie is harder to achieve. (p. 396)</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>We cannot redirect technology without building new countervailing powers.  And we cannot build countervailing powers without relying on civil society organizations that bring people together around shared issues and cultivate norms of self-governance and political action. (p. 396)</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Organizational Forms</Name><Description>Experiment with new organizational forms</Description><Identifier>_428b5658-4945-11ee-950f-79af1083ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>(p. 398)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Action</Name><Description>Coordinate collective action</Description><Identifier>_e54934ea-4b85-11ee-a4d8-bf82f682ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Consumers</Name><Description>Consumer choice, the ultimate uncoordinated, individual action, suffers mightily from the collective action dilemma. (p. 398)</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Civil-Society Organizations</Name><Description>Although other organizations, such as labor unions, can also play these roles, civil-society are important, especially when the main issues ... have effects on large numbers of people and cut across traditional groups.</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>... collective action requires a large group of people acting together to achieve an objective ... Such action is costly for most people, who will have to spend time to become informed, to attend meetings, to change their consumption habits, and occasionally to go out and protest.  Those costs multiply when there is a counterpush from companies and sometimes, even worse, from state security services... These dynamics produce the "free-rider" problem: people who share the same values may nevertheless be tempted not to take part in collective action in order to avoid paying the costs... without coordination, only a minority of people who desire social change take part in collective action. (p. 398)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Forum</Name><Description>Provide a forum for debate and trusted information dissemination</Description><Identifier>_e5493670-4b85-11ee-a4d8-bf82f682ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.2.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Civil-Society Organizations</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Incentives</Name><Description>Create both negative and positive incentives to coordinate protests and public pressure on misbehaving companies</Description><Identifier>_e54937ce-4b85-11ee-a4d8-bf82f682ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.2.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Civil-Society Organizations</Name><Description>In addition to providing a forum for debate and trusted information dissemination, civil-society organizations can create both carrots and sticks to coordinate protests and public pressure on misbehaving companies. (p. 399)</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Ethos &amp; Connections</Name><Description>Cultivate an ethos for taking part in activities that are good for the public interest and develop links among participants</Description><Identifier>_e5493990-4b85-11ee-a4d8-bf82f682ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.2.2.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Civil-Society Organizations</Name><Description>On the carrot side, they cultivate an ethos for taking part in activities that are good for the public interest and additionally develop links between different people, who then encourage one another to participate. (p. 399)</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Peer Pressure</Name><Description>Apply peer pressure to induce participation</Description><Identifier>_e5493aee-4b85-11ee-a4d8-bf82f682ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.2.2.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Civil-Society Organizations</Name><Description>For sticks, they can sometimes shame individuals for free riding on the efforts of others. (p. 399)</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Online Communities</Name><Description>Build new and better online communities</Description><Identifier>_e5493c60-4b85-11ee-a4d8-bf82f682ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.2.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Online Communities</Name><Description>Although the optimism of the early 2000s about social media and the internet providing a forum for a digital "public sphere" has been dashed, new and better online communities can be built. (p. 399)</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Democratic Institutions</Name><Description>Pathways for democratic institutions to cultivate new and better online communities are critical. (p. 399)</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Periodic elections to select representatives are not the only aspect of democratic politics.  Self-governance, both at workplaces and more broadly, may be as important as elections. (p. 399)
There are some digital technologies that can play a helpful role rather than a harmful one, and finding ways to encourage their development is crucial. (p. 400)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Forums</Name><Description>Create new forums in which debate and exchange of opinions can be carried out</Description><Identifier>_e5493de6-4b85-11ee-a4d8-bf82f682ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.2.3.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>For example, digital tools are well suited for creating new forums in which debate and exchange of opinions can be carried out in real time and within a prespecified set of rules. (p. 400)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Meetings</Name><Description>Enable larger-scale cross-cutting associations</Description><Identifier>_e5493f62-4b85-11ee-a4d8-bf82f682ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.2.3.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Online meetings and communication can reduce participation costs, enabling larger-scale cross-cutting associations.  Digital tools can also ensure that even in large meetings, individuals can participate in debate by making comments or recording their approval or disapproval.  If these tools are well designed, they can help empower and amplify diverse voices ... (p. 400)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Online Tools</Name><Description>Continuously update pro-democratic online tools as new challenges develop</Description><Identifier>_e54940de-4b85-11ee-a4d8-bf82f682ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.2.3.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>as a complemen, rather than as a full substitute, to traditional, in-person civic engagement. (p. 401)</OtherInformation></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Policies</Name><Description>Articulate policy solutions based upon the new narrative, research, and expertise</Description><Identifier>_428b573e-4945-11ee-950f-79af1083ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>The existence of countervailing powers and even new institutions by themselves will not redirect technology.  Specific policies that change incentives and encourage socially beneficial innovations are necessary. (p. 402)</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Incentives</Name><Description>Institute government subsidies for developing more socially beneficial technologies</Description><Identifier>_428b5810-4945-11ee-950f-79af1083ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Market Incentives for Redirection ~ Government subsidies for developing more socially beneficial technologies are one of the most powerful means of redirecting technology ... (p. 4.2)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Metrics</Name><Description>Measure the impact of digital technology</Description><Identifier>_58bf89a2-4a0e-11ee-9800-1fb6f282ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Determining how different digital technologies are used and their impact on wages, inequality, and surveillance [is hard] ... Nevertheless, there are a number of principles useful for creating a framework for measuring the impact of digital technology. (p. 403)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Surveillance</Name><Description>Prevent the most intrusive forms of surveillance and data collection on employees</Description><Identifier>_58bf8d76-4a0e-11ee-9800-1fb6f282ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.2.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>OSHA</Name><Description>A government agency such as OSHA could develop clear guidelines that prevent the most intrusive forms of surveillance and data collection on employees ... (p. 403)</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Employees</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Data Collection</Name><Description>Regulate data collection on consumers and citizens</Description><Identifier>_58bf8e70-4a0e-11ee-9800-1fb6f282ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.2.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>... other agencies could similarly regulate data collection on consumers and citizens. (p. 403)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Patents</Name><Description>Cease enforcing patents on technologies that are aimed at worker or citizen surveillance</Description><Identifier>_58bf8f56-4a0e-11ee-9800-1fb6f282ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.2.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Federal Government</Name><Description>... the federal government could also decide not to enforce patents on technologies that are aimed at worker or citizen surveillance. (p. 403)</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Privacy</Name><Description>Identify and subsidize technologies that provide tools for worker and user privacy</Description><Identifier>_58bf9032-4a0e-11ee-9800-1fb6f282ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.2.4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Workers</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Technology Users</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Conversely, technologies that provide tools for worker and user privacy can also be identified and subsidized. (p. 403)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Labor</Name><Description>Subsidize technologies that raise the labor share</Description><Identifier>_c19d219a-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.2.5</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>... introduction of robots and other automation technologies almost always leads to significantly lower labor share.  Likewise, technologies that create new tasks for workers tend to raise the labor share.  On this basis, technologies that raise the labor share can be encouraged via subsidies. (p. 404)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Focus</Name><Description>Encourage greater focus on human-complementary and human-empowering technologies</Description><Identifier>_c19d237a-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.2.6</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>... subsidies for research that are human complementary can be provided on the basis of more detailed data about whether new methods are complementing humans or automating work when used in practice... new digital technologies can complement humans by creating new tasks... What policy makers should strive for is cultivating a plurality of approaches to encourage a greater focus on human-complementary and human-empowering technologies. (p. 404)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Big Tech</Name><Description>Break up big tech</Description><Identifier>_c19d249c-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Breaking up big tech... High levels of market concentration and gargantuan monopolies can choke off innovation and distort its direction... a handful of companies are dominating the direction of digital technologies and especially AI...  breaking up the largest tech giants to reduce their dominance and create room for greater diversity of innovations is an important part of redirecting technology...  breakup and more broadly antitrust shojuld be considered as a complementary tool to the more fundamental aim of redirecting technology away from automation, surveillance, data collection, and digital advertising. (p. 405)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Taxes</Name><Description>Reform taxation</Description><Identifier>_c19d2636-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Tax Reform... the US has taxed labor at an average rate of about 25 percent over the last four decades because of payroll and federal income taxes, while imposing a much lower taxes on equipment and software capital... A company investing in automation equipment or software today pays a tax of less than 5 percent -- fully 20 percentage points lower than the taxes it faces when it hires workers to perform the same tasks. (p. 406) </OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Payrolls</Name><Description>Significantly reduce or eliminate payroll taxes</Description><Identifier>_c19d276c-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.4.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>(p. 407)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Capital Gains</Name><Description>Modestly increase taxes on capital gains</Description><Identifier>_c19d2898-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.4.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>(p. 407)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Loopholes</Name><Description>Close tax loopholes</Description><Identifier>_c19d2aaa-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.4.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Multinational Corporations</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>... simultaneously close tax loopholes, including schemes that minimize tax liabilities of multinational corporations. (p. 407)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Workers</Name><Description>Invest in workers.</Description><Identifier>_c19d2bfe-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.5</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Workers</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Companies</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Investing in Workers.  The tax incentives for investment in equipment and software are not available to companies when it comes to investments in workers.  (p. 407)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Capital &amp; Labor</Name><Description>Equalize the rates at which capital and labor are taxed</Description><Identifier>_c19d2d20-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.5.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Equalizing the rates at which capital and labor are taxed is an important step in removing the bias in favor of automation ahead of hiring and investing in workers. (p. 407)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Training</Name><Description>Povide training for low-skilled workers</Description><Identifier>_c19d2e56-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.5.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Low-Education Workers</Name><Description>... training of low-education workers was an important pillar of shared prosperity before the 1980s.</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Worker marginal productivity can be raised by post-schooling training. (p. 407)   Institutional solutions and government subsidies to training could rectify the ... underinvestment problem. (p. 408)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Leadership</Name><Description>Lead the redirection of technology</Description><Identifier>_c19d2f8c-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.6</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Government</Name><Description>The government is not the engine of innovation, yet it can play a central role in redirecting technological change through taxes, subsidies, regulations, and agenda setting. (p. 408)</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Government Leadership to Redirect Technological Change.  </OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Research Teams</Name><Description>Convene and fund research teams to develop digital technologies that complement human skills</Description><Identifier>_c19d30ea-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.6.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>US Government</Name><Description>... the US government could convene and fund research teams to develop digital technologies that complement human skills to be used in education and health care, and commit to deloying them in US schools and Veterans Administration hospitals, providing they meet the requisite technical standards.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Education Sector</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Health Care Sector</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>US Schools</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Veterans Administration</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>This is not, we hasten to point out, traditional "industrial policy," which involves bureaucrats attempting to pick winners, either in terms of companies or specific technologies. (p. 409) </OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Technologies &amp; Benefits</Name><Description>Identify classes of technologies that have more socially beneficial consequences</Description><Identifier>_c19d3248-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.6.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Instead of picking winners, redirecting technology is much more about identifying classes of technologies that have more socially beneficial consequences. (p. 410)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Empowerment</Name><Description>Encourage the development of technologies that are more complementary to workers and citizen empowerment</Description><Identifier>_c19d3374-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.6.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Workers</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Citizens</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>(p. 410)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Privacy &amp; Data Ownership</Name><Description>Strengthen the protection of user privacy.</Description><Identifier>_c19d34c8-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.7</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Privacy Protection and Data Ownership. (p. 410)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Approval</Name><Description>Require platforms to get explicit approval from users on what data they will collect and how they will use it.</Description><Identifier>_c19d3644-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.7.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>(p. 410)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Ownership</Name><Description>Provide ownership rights to users for their data</Description><Identifier>_c19d3770-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.7.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>... providing ownership rights to users for their data ... may be more effective than privacy regulation. (p. 411)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Income</Name><Description>Ensure that users receive income from their data</Description><Identifier>_c19d38b0-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.7.2.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Data Unions</Name><Description>can negotiate prices and terms for all users or subgroups, thus circumventing "divide-and-conquer" strategies by platforms </Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>(p. 411)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Models</Name><Description>Provide models for other types of workplace organizations</Description><Identifier>_c19d3a22-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.7.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Data Unions</Name><Description>could additionally provide models for other types of workplace organizations.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Workplace Organizations</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Section 230</Name><Description>Repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.</Description><Identifier>_c19d3b76-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.8</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Internet Platforms</Name><Description>Under public pressure, tech platforms have recently taken some steps to limit misinformation and extreme content.  But they are unlikely to do much themselves for a simple reason:  their business model thrives on controversial and sensational material.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Government Regulators</Name><Description>This means that government regulation has to play a role ...</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Congress</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Central to the regulation of the tech industry is Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which protects internet platforms against legal action or regulation because of the content they host... 

make platforms accountable when they promote such content. (p. 412) </OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Advertising</Name><Description>Impose an advertising tax</Description><Identifier>_c19d3cc0-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.9</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Digital Advertising Tax.  We advocate a nontrivial advertising tax to encourage alternative business models, such as those based upon subscriptions. (p. 413)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Wealth</Name><Description>Impose wealth taxes</Description><Identifier>_c19d3edc-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.10</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Wealth Taxes.  ... with the need for additional tax revenues for bolstering the social safety net and other investments ... well-administered wealth taxes can raise valuable revenue. (p. 414)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Corporate Income</Name><Description>Combine wealth taxes with corporate income taxes</Description><Identifier>_c19d403a-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.11</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>... wealth taxes should be combined with corporate income taxes, imposed directly on company profits, which are easier to assess and collect. (p. 415)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Wealth &amp; Social Safety</Name><Description>Redistribute wealth and strengthen the social safety net</Description><Identifier>_c19d41a2-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.12</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Workers</Name><Description>There is considerable evidence suggesting that people are more satisfied and are more engaged with their community when they feel that they are contributing value to society. (p. 416)</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Redistribution and Strengthening the Social Safety Net.  The US needs a better social safety net and better and more reasonable redistribution. (p. 415)
Although robust redistribution and improved social safety nets, by themselves, are not going to reduce the power of large tech companies, they can be an effective tool in reducing large inequalities ... 
universal basic income (UBI) ... is ... not ideal for bolstering the social safety net ... because it transfers resources not just to those who need them but to everybody... UBI is also likely the wrong type of solution to our current predicament, especially compared to measures aimed at creating new opportunities for workers.  (p. 416)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Social Safety Nets</Name><Description>Strengthen existing social safety nets</Description><Identifier>_c19d435a-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.12.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>... rather than search for fanciful transfer mechanisms, society should strengthen its existing social safety nets and crucially attempt to combine this with the creation of meaningful, well-paying jobs for all demographic groups -- which means redircting technology. (p. 417)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Jobs</Name><Description>Create meaningful, well-paying jobs for all demographic groups</Description><Identifier>_c19d44c2-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.12.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Education</Name><Description>Deploy human-complementary AI to improve educational outcomes and create meaningful new jobs</Description><Identifier>_c19d4634-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.13</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Schools</Name><Description>... schooling is deficient in many nations, especially for students from low socioeconomic backgrounds...
schools are one of the areas where human-complementary AI can be most fruitfully deployed to improve outcomes and create meaningful new jobs. (p. 417)</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Minimum Wages</Name><Description>Require minimum wages as part of a broader package aimed at redirecting technology away from automation.</Description><Identifier>_c19d479c-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.14</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>(p. 419)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Academia</Name><Description>Reform academia</Description><Identifier>_c19d490e-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.15</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Academia</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Universities</Name><Description>... universities build the perspectives, interests, and skills of millions of talented     young people who will work in the technology sector.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Academics</Name><Description>... top academics often work with leading tech firms and also directly influence public opinion.</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Grants &amp; Consultations</Name><Description>Require greater transparency of grant funding and consulting engagements from tech companies</Description><Identifier>_c19d4a8a-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.15.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Academics</Name><Description>... many academics in computer science, engineering, statistics, economics, and physics departments -- and, of course, business schools -- in leading universities receive grants and consulting engagements from tech companies.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Tech Companies</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>We believe it is imperative to require greater transparency of such funding relationships and potentially establish some limits to restore greater independence and autonomy to academia. (p. 420)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Basic Research</Name><Description>Increase government funding for basic research</Description><Identifier>_c19d4bfc-4ad7-11ee-801e-69ca1583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.15.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Governments</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>More government funding for basic research would also remove the dependence of academics on corporate sponsors.</OtherInformation></Objective></Goal></StrategicPlanCore><AdministrativeInformation><StartDate>2023-05-31</StartDate><EndDate/><PublicationDate>2023-09-04</PublicationDate><Source>https://shapingwork.mit.edu/power-and-progress/</Source><Submitter><GivenName>Owen</GivenName><Surname>Ambur</Surname><PhoneNumber/><EmailAddress>Owen.Ambur@verizon.net</EmailAddress></Submitter></AdministrativeInformation></PerformancePlanOrReport>