<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="part2stratml.xsl"?>
<PerformancePlanOrReport xmlns="urn:ISO:std:iso:17469:tech:xsd:PerformancePlanOrReport" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"

 xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ISO:std:iso:17469:tech:xsd:PerformancePlanOrReport http://stratml.us/references/PerformancePlanOrReport20160216.xsd" Type="Strategic_Plan"><Name>Reforming &amp; Restructuring the SBA</Name><Description>Reforming and restructuring the SBA under a conservative Administration
would meet the needs of America's small-business owners and entrepreneurs,
not special interests in Washington, D.C. Entrepreneurs believe the SBA is fairly
archaic in its operations and programming and must be transformed to serve
small businesses in the modern economy effectively.33 Therefore, a restructured
and reformed SBA would end the long-term deficiencies, practices, and problems
that have prolonged the decades-long cycle of waste, fraud, and mismanagement.</Description><OtherInformation>Moreover, the SBA Administrator and leadership can provide significant value to
all small businesses by strongly advocating for their policy needs and fostering an
agencywide culture that values all small-business owners and does not exclude
certain groups. Under a conservative Administration, success would yield:
^^
* A highly qualified SBA Administrator and leadership team that can
competently run the agency and enthusiastically advocate for the policy
issues and needs of small-business owners and entrepreneurs.
^
* A tighter, more focused SBA that concentrates on congressionally
authorized programs.
^
* An accountable SBA Administrator and sta! who report regularly to
Congress, respond on a timely basis to requests from individual Members
of Congress, and satisfactorily implement or respond to IG and GAO
recommendations.
^
* A full accounting of and an end to waste, fraud, and abuse in all COVID-19
relief programs, including the PPP and EIDL programs, and action that
follows the rule of law by ensuring that loan recipients who are not eligible
for loan forgiveness or who falsified loan applications either pay back the
funds or are referred to law enforcement.
^
* An end to SBA direct lending.
^
* An approach to small-business lending and capital programs that supports
a resilient small-business supply chain (for example, by financing
technological upgrades and capital expenditures).
^
* Outreach to all small businesses and those that are eligible for program
support across sectors and geographic areas. Through congressionally
authorized programs and collaboration with partners and business
associations, the SBA could use the latest technology and platforms to implement relevant initiatives to reach small businesses. Programs would
be nonduplicative and implemented on a first-come, first-served basis.
^
* A modern, revamped, and streamlined SBA that better utilizes current
technology and platforms for operations, for reporting, and in its programs
to reach, service, and engage small businesses.
^
* An Office of Advocacy that is strengthened by a renewed mandate and
additional resources to protect against overregulation along with a research
agenda that includes measuring the total cost that federal regulation
imposes on small businesses.</OtherInformation><StrategicPlanCore><Organization><Name>2025 Presidential Transition Project</Name><Acronym>PTP2025</Acronym><Identifier>_652e8848-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><Description>The 2025 Presidential Transition Project paves the way for an effective conservative Administration based on four pillars: a policy agenda, Presidential Personnel Database, Presidential Administration Academy, and playbook for the first 180 days of the next Administration.</Description><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Karen Kerrigan</Name><Description>SBA Chapter Author</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>The Heritage Foundation</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Small Business Administration</Name><Description>The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) supports U.S. entrepreneurship
and small business growth by strengthening free enterprise through policy advocacy and facilitating programs that help entrepreneurs to launch and grow their businesses and compete e!ectively in the global marketplace</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Small-Business Owners</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Entrepreneurs</Name><Description/></Stakeholder></Organization><Vision><Description>The needs of America's small-business owners and entrepreneurs are met</Description><Identifier>_652e89f6-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier></Vision><Mission><Description>To reform and restructure the SBA</Description><Identifier>_652e8b22-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier></Mission><Value><Name>Conservativism</Name><Description/></Value><Value><Name>Entrepreneurship</Name><Description/></Value><Value><Name>Free Enterprise</Name><Description/></Value><Value><Name>Accountability</Name><Description/></Value><Value><Name>Performance</Name><Description/></Value><Goal><Name>Accountability &amp; Performance</Name><Description>Compel a culture of accountability and performance</Description><Identifier>_652e8ca8-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Accountability and Managerial Practice. The SBA lacks accountability and
managerial practices to measure the e!ectiveness, success, and integrity of its
various programs. As a future Administration evaluates agency structure and the
particulars of how the SBA is spending appropriated funds, it should immediately
require actions and procedures to compel a culture of accountability and performance. Specifically:</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Metrics &amp; Procedures</Name><Description>Require performance metrics and internal procedures to safeguard
taxpayer dollars and program integrity.</Description><Identifier>_652e8dc0-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>As noted in an October 2022
IG report, failure to adopt procedures that would reliably capture data and
information for various programs, coupled with significant challenges and
weaknesses regarding IT investments, systems development, and security
controls, presents significant risks to program integrity and increased
risk of waste, fraud, and abuse.34 Addressing these shortcomings and risks
should be a priority challenge and action item for the next Administration.
As underscored by the Inspector General in his introduction to the report,
“Pandemic response has, in many instances, magnified the challenging
systemic issues in SBA’s mission-related work.”35</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>OIG &amp; GAO Recommendations</Name><Description>Review all internal government watchdog recommendations and
require that SBA management implement or address outstanding
and ongoing OIG and GAO recommendations within a specified
time frame (ideally within 90 days of a recommendation) and on an
ongoing basis.</Description><Identifier>_652e8ee2-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>SBA Management</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>SBA OIG</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>GAO</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Advocacy</Name><Description>Strengthen the Office of Advocacy.</Description><Identifier>_652e9004-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>SBA Office of Advocacy</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>The SBA Office of Advocacy (Advocacy) is "an independent office" within the SBA.36 It accounts for about one one-thousandth of SBA spending and 0.75 percent of SBA personnel. Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, both under its current authority and with suggested reforms, the Office of Advocacy could be a powerful weapon against the administrative state’s regulatory extremism.</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Rules</Name><Description>Require agencies to provide a copy of any proposed rule along with initial regulatory flexibility analysis to the Office of Advocacy</Description><Identifier>_652e911c-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Amend the RFA so that all agencies are required to provide a copy
of any proposed rule (other than bona fide emergency rules) along
with initial regulatory flexibility analysis to the Office of Advocacy
at least 60 days before a notice of proposed rulemaking is submitted
for publication in the Federal Register. The Office of Advocacy would
submit comments to agencies within 30 days, and each agency would have
to consider these comments, make changes in the proposed rule based
on those comments, or explain in a revised regulatory flexibility analysis
why it chose not to change the proposed rule. The Office of Advocacy's
pre-proposing comments would be published on the agencies’ and its
own websites.
^^
RFA economic analysis should be expanded to include indirect costs
along with direct costs. In addition, the next Administration should
require other agencies to seek Advocacy's input. Currently, other agencies
deny Advocacy the ability to enforce their duty to consider the e!ect of
regulations on small entities by construing their regulations as not having
significant economic impact, which would otherwise serve as a trigger for
Advocacy’s input. Congress should presumptively exempt small businesses
from new agency rules to force agencies to seek Advocacy’s input and
permit new rules to apply to small businesses only with Advocacy signo!
under specified criteria.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Budget</Name><Description>Increase the Office of Advocacy's budget</Description><Identifier>_652e923e-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Increase the Office of Advocacy's budget by at least 50 percent ($4.6
million). This would allow Advocacy to hire approximately 25 attorneys,
economists, and scientists and enhance its role in the regulatory process.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Compliance</Name><Description>Direct federal agencies to comply with the Regulatory Flexibility Act</Description><Identifier>_652e9374-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Federal Agencies</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Explicitly direct federal agencies to comply with the RFA. This would
be similar to the approach adopted by President Trump in his January and
February 2017 executive orders directing agencies to relieve the cost and
burden of regulation on business.37 Advocacy should organize regional
roundtables, onsite small-business visits, and an online platform to hear
directly from small businesses and entities as it did from June 2017 through
September 2018.38 This activity produced 26 letters to federal agencies
and highlighted specific regulations that need reform and how Congress
had addressed the most burdensome rules through the Congressional
Review Act.39</OtherInformation></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>COVID-19 Loans &amp; Grants</Name><Description>Conduct a final accounting and accelerated cleanup of fraudulent COVID-19 loan and grant activity</Description><Identifier>_652e94aa-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>COVID-19 Lending Program Accountability and Cleanup. A major
immediate priority for the next Administration should be a final accounting and
accelerated cleanup of fraudulent COVID-19 loan and grant activity. As noted by
the SBA IG, "managing COVID-19 stimulus lending is the greatest overall challenge
facing SBA, and it may likely continue to be for many years as the agency grapples
with fraud in the programs…."40 The next Administration should:</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Support &amp; Expertise</Name><Description>Bring in private-sector support and expertise to close out these programs</Description><Identifier>_652e95d6-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Consider bringing in private-sector support and expertise to close
out these programs. Forgiveness and fraud must be dealt with as swiftly
as possible, and law enforcement officials must pursue fraud vigorously.
Entities receiving PPP loans that did not meet eligibility for forgiveness
must be required to pay back the money.
^^
For example, under the CARES Act,41 PPP loan applicants generally were
eligible only if, together with all their affiliates, they had no more than 500
employees. Numerous Planned Parenthood a"liates self-certified eligibility
for PPP loans during the initial wave of loans that were governed by the
CARES Act's size requirement. Many Senators and Representatives asserted
that these Planned Parenthood organizations were ineligible because --
considered together with their affiliates -- they exceeded the maximum
eligible size.42 The Trump Administration SBA notified several Planned
Parenthood PPP recipients of its preliminary determination of their
ineligibility and of SBA’s authority to take various actions against applicants
that falsely certified their eligibility.43
^^
To date, despite continued oversight attempts by Members of Congress,44
the SBA has taken no action on the Planned Parenthood loans other
than to forgive them, and in 2021, it approved new PPP loans to Planned
Parenthood affiliates.45</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Forgiveness &amp; Oversight</Name><Description>Cooperate with ongoing congressional oversight efforts and determine whether SBA has authority to reverse the forgiveness decisions.</Description><Identifier>_652e970c-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>If it does have that authority, the SBA should reverse the
forgiveness decisions for the subject loans, reiterate its preliminary
determinations of ineligibility, investigate the matter more thoroughly, and
take all appropriate action when its investigation concludes. Regardless of
whether it reverses its forgiveness, if its investigation uncovers evidence
that Planned Parenthood affiliates or any other loan recipients knowingly
misrepresented their eligibility in their applications, the SBA should make
appropriate referrals to the Department of Justice.</OtherInformation></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Loans</Name><Description>Address challenges the SBA has experienced in its administration of its disaster loan program</Description><Identifier>_652e9928-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Federal Emergency Management Administration</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Disaster Loan Program and Direct Lending. The SBA's disaster loan program provides low-interest loans to personal, business, and nonprofit borrowers
following a federally declared disaster. The program suffers from problems of
coordination with Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) disaster assistance. For example, disaster relief applicants have an incentive to avoid being approved for SBA disaster loans in order to increase the amount of FEMA assistance for which they are eligible. Moreover, the availability of disaster loans reduces individuals' incentives to purchase disaster-related insurance. More than 90 percent of SBA disaster loans are loans to individuals such as homeowners, not to small businesses.
^^
In view of the challenges the SBA has experienced in its administration of this
program, as well as the fraud and abuse in the EIDL COVID-19-related program
and the IG's concern that the systemic problems within this lending program
undermine the SBA's work, the next Administration should:</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Disaster Loans</Name><Description>Work with Congress to assess the extent to which disaster loans
should be offered by another agency rather than the SBA and explore
private-sector channels for administering the loans.</Description><Identifier>_652e9a68-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>4.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Direct Lending</Name><Description>Specify clearly that no new direct lending programs will be developed at the SBA.</Description><Identifier>_652e9c52-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>4.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Religious Entities</Name><Description>Address the eligibility of religious entities for SBA loans</Description><Identifier>_652e9db0-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>5</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Religious Entities</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Eligibility of Religious Entities for SBA Loans. Current SBA regulations46
and SBA Form 197147 make certain religious entities ineligible to participate in
several SBA loan programs. The Trump Administration proposed a rule that would
remove the provisions on the ground that they violate the First Amendment.48
Subsequent Supreme Court decisions have made their unconstitutionality clearer.49
^^
In an April 3, 2020, letter to Congress pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 530D,50 the
Trump Administration SBA advised that two such provisions violate the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and that it therefore would not enforce them.
On January 19, 2021, the Trump Administration SBA proposed a rule to remove
all of the unconstitutional religious exclusions from its regulations.51 The SBA has
not acted on the proposed rule.
^^
A similar religious exclusion once appeared in the regulation governing eligibility for SBA Business Loan Programs,52 but it was removed in a June 2022 final rule
that noted tension with the First Amendment and Supreme Court precedent.53 That
final rule announced that the SBA would nonetheless continue to make religious
eligibility determinations for business loan applicants to comply with putative
Establishment Clause requirements,54 but Supreme Court precedent and O"ce of
Legal Counsel memoranda refute the notion that large government-backed loan
programs raise any Establishment Clause concerns.55
^^
The SBA uses the same "Religious Eligibility Worksheet," SBA Form 1971, to
make eligibility determinations for all affected programs, including the Business
Loan Programs. Thus, the SBA continues to act as though the unconstitutional
regulation were still in place, and there is no Establishment Clause basis for doing so. The next Administration should immediately:</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Enforcement</Name><Description>Notify Congress under 28 U.S. Code § 530D that it will not enforce
these unconstitutional regulations.</Description><Identifier>_652ea026-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>5.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Form 1971</Name><Description>Take down SBA Form 1971.</Description><Identifier>_652ea1a2-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>5.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Rule</Name><Description>Finalize the Trump Administration's proposed rule or publish its own
updated proposed rule to remove the unconstitutional regulations.</Description><Identifier>_652ea300-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>5.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>SBIR &amp; STTR</Name><Description>Support small business innovation research and technology transfer</Description><Identifier>_652ea45e-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>6</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology
Transfer Programs. The SBA "coordinates and monitors the Small Business
Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs for all federal agencies with extramural budgets for research or research and
development (R/R&amp;D) in excess of the expenditures established in sections 9(f )
and 9(n) of the Small Business Act."56 The SBIR and STTR Extension Act of 2022 extended these programs from September 30, 2022, through September 30, 2025.57
^^
SBIR requires that 3.2 percent of spending by agencies with extramural R&amp;D
budgets of $100 million or more must be directed to small businesses. STTR allocates 0.45 percent of federal research spending to small firms.58 Research has shown that this small portion of federal R&amp;D spending is disproportionately e!ective.59
The SBIR program has consistently demonstrated its ability to fund advanced
technologies through to private-market viability and invests more in America's
heartland than venture capital invests.60
^^
SBIR and STTR have overcome the tendency of federal contracting officers
to deal only with large firms that are familiar to them and have the expertise and
lobbying clout to navigate the federal procurement process. The next Administration should:</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Continuity</Name><Description>Continue the SBIR and SBTT programs as they successfully fund the next wave of technological innovation to compete with Big Tech.</Description><Identifier>_652ea5d0-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>6.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Expansion</Name><Description>Urge Congress to expand the amount that other agencies are required to set aside from their general R&amp;D budgets for the SBIR program.</Description><Identifier>_652ea742-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>6.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Capital Investments</Name><Description>Ensure the enactment of stricter rules requiring that SBIR funds must be expended on capital investments in the United States.</Description><Identifier>_652ea8aa-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>6.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Small Manufacturers</Name><Description>Expand the private market for capital in small-manufacturer expansion</Description><Identifier>_652eaa8a-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Small Manufacturers</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Domestic Manufacturing and Small Business. Small businesses in the
manufacturing sector face shortfalls in access to capital.61 As manufacturing
employment, domestic business investment, and non–information technology
output have declined,62 expectations for market returns and the capital available
to small manufacturing enterprises have diminished. This is especially true for
capital-intensive sectors like transportation and energy that require large up-front
investments and relatively lower-margin sectors like plastics, textiles, furniture,
and agriculture. Yet these industries and others like them traditionally have been
the backbone of American manufacturing employment. They also are sources of
self-sufficiency and resilience at a time when global supply chains are increasingly uncertain.
^^
The public policy problems that are caused by declining small manufacturing
are especially acute when it comes to the production of advanced technologies.
Other agencies and programs invest immense taxpayer resources in basic science
and research. Over time, that research results in some breakthrough technologies,
but when it is time to put these breakthroughs into practice by manufacturing
goods and services, much of the necessary productive capacity is o!shore.63 For
many technologies, the American economy lacks the capacity to "scale up" innovations that might not be immediately profitable. Instead, those technologies are
put into practice abroad. In this way, foreign companies and foreign productive
sites buy and implement taxpayer-funded American technologies.
^^
The SBA's existing programs should be reformed to expand the private market
for capital in small-manufacturer expansion. The next Administration should:</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Equipment &amp; Facilities</Name><Description>Make available a category of Section 7(a) loans with a larger available principal that is used to finance manufacturing facility construction and equipment upgrading</Description><Identifier>_652eabfc-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Congress</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Ask Congress to make available a category of Section 7(a) loans with
a larger available principal that is used to finance manufacturing
facility construction and equipment upgrading. The proposed SBA
Reauthorization and Improvement Act of 2019, for example, would
have increased the maximum loan principal to $50 million for advanced
manufacturing construction and upgrading.64 The Section 7(a) loan
program operates through private lenders and guarantees a portion of
private-sector loans made to qualifying small businesses. The maximum
principal available is $5 million, but small businesses in capital-intensive
sectors require significantly larger amounts of capital to finance up-front
capital costs.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>SBIC</Name><Description>Reform the Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) program to refocus its support on small businesses rather than technology startups only. </Description><Identifier>_652ead6e-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Small Businesses</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>The SBIC program operates through private venture capital
and private equity funds by providing eligible funds with guaranteed debt
financing to support investments in small businesses. However, the program largely duplicates private-sector venture capital to the extent that the sector
receiving much of its support is software and information technology, which
already receive the lion’s share of venture capital investment.65
^^
In addition, Congress should reform the SBIC program to make its
financing more favorable to capital-intense investments and small
manufacturers. The Health, Economic Assistance, Liability Protection,
and Schools (HEALS) Act, introduced in 2020,66 and American Innovation
and Manufacturing Act, introduced in 2021,67 would allow SBIC to o!er
longer-term financing to manufacturers and make the program more
fiscally sustainable.</OtherInformation></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Size Standard</Name><Description>Modernize the standard definition of small-business size</Description><Identifier>_652eaefe-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>8</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Small-Business Size Standard Modernization. Many small-business programs both inside and outside the SBA use the SBA's definition of "small business."
Under the Small Business Act, the SBA is tasked with defining what counts as a
small business and ensuring that the definition varies from industry to industry to
reflect di!erences in regular size by industry. However, the SBA's small-business
size standards reflect a one-size-fits-all approach under which all businesses within
its size standard are considered small businesses for all eligible purposes, from government contracting preferences to eligibility for SBA loans through private banks.
At the same time, the SBA is an outlier among competing economies in not
considering medium-sized enterprises along with small businesses, often referred
to collectively as small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Medium-sized and
regional businesses are increasingly critical to maintaining competition. The next
Administration should:</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>MSBs</Name><Description>Create a "medium-sized business" classification</Description><Identifier>_652eb07a-4769-11ee-bb84-8058fe82ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>8.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Congress</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Encourage Congress to create a “medium-sized business”
classification with its eligibility for programs confined to access
to capital programs from projects for which credit elsewhere
does not exist.</OtherInformation></Objective></Goal></StrategicPlanCore><AdministrativeInformation><StartDate/><EndDate/><PublicationDate>2023-08-30</PublicationDate><Source>https://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-25.pdf</Source><Submitter><GivenName>Owen</GivenName><Surname>Ambur</Surname><PhoneNumber/><EmailAddress>Owen.Ambur@verizon.net</EmailAddress></Submitter></AdministrativeInformation></PerformancePlanOrReport>