<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<PerformancePlanOrReport xmlns="urn:ISO:std:iso:17469:tech:xsd:PerformancePlanOrReport" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"

 xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ISO:std:iso:17469:tech:xsd:PerformancePlanOrReport http://stratml.us/references/PerformancePlanOrReport20160216.xsd" Type="Strategic_Plan"><Name>LEARNING AGENDA IN SUPPORT OF THE PRESIDENT’S MANAGEMENT AGENDA</Name><Description>This PMA Learning Agenda identifies evidence gaps related to advancing PMA priorities. In addition, the American Rescue Plan Implementation Team released a learning agenda related to equity and the implementation of the American Rescue Plan. All of these efforts are critical in communicating and coordinating what evidence is needed and how it can be used to improve the working of Government. Looking ahead, as these learning agendas spur research, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will work to share findings with leadership across the Government to inform decision making.</Description><OtherInformation>This Learning Agenda works toward the PMA priorities across Federal agencies in three learning areas of focus. These areas of focus are intended to initiate strategic evidence-building efforts, not to be comprehensive.</OtherInformation><StrategicPlanCore><Organization><Name>Office of Management and Budget</Name><Acronym>OMB</Acronym><Identifier>_fc2d8890-ba77-4c51-bbad-1cc10871c14e</Identifier><Description/><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Jason Miller</Name><Description>Deputy Director for Management, Office of Management and Budget</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>PMA Learning Agenda Stakeholders</Name><Description>Anyone can help answer these questions, including you. You might be a
researcher, student, practitioner, industry expert, or public servant. You might
be from a government agency, a community organization, a university, a
business, or a philanthropy.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Researchers</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Students</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Practitioners</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Industry Experts</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Public Servants</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Government Agencies</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Community Organizations</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Universities</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Businesses</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Philanthropies</Name><Description/></Stakeholder></Organization><Vision><Description>Government works better</Description><Identifier>_2601b696-35cb-11ed-800b-3db1f382ea00</Identifier></Vision><Mission><Description>To identify evidence gaps related to advancing PMA priorities</Description><Identifier>_2601b786-35cb-11ed-800b-3db1f382ea00</Identifier></Mission><Value><Name>Learning</Name><Description/></Value><Value><Name>Equity</Name><Description/></Value><Value><Name>Diversity</Name><Description/></Value><Value><Name>Inclusion</Name><Description/></Value><Value><Name>Engagement</Name><Description/></Value><Value><Name>Empowerment</Name><Description/></Value><Value><Name>Performance</Name><Description/></Value><Value><Name>Excellence</Name><Description/></Value><Value><Name>Security</Name><Description/></Value><Value><Name>Trust</Name><Description/></Value><Goal><Name>Federal Workforce</Name><Description>Strengthen and Empower the Federal Workforce</Description><Identifier>_2601b81c-35cb-11ed-800b-3db1f382ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Federal Agencies</Name><Description>In their agency Learning Agendas, more than half of agencies included
questions on the Federal workforce. A few illustrative questions from
those published agency Learning Agendas:</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Office of Personnel Management</Name><Description>What strategies are effective for increasing and maintaining the capacity of the Federal workforce to meet critical agency needs?</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Department of Commerce</Name><Description>How could the Department’s leadership development programs be more effective in supporting succession planning?</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Department of the Treasury</Name><Description>How can Treasury increase representation with respect to its public-facing call-center workforce?</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>How can the Federal Government strengthen and empower its workforce, so it can best serve the American people?
^^
The Biden-Harris Administration wants the Federal Government to be a model
employer, operated by a talented, diverse, and engaged workforce. What are
effective strategies to hire, retain, engage, and grow talent within the Federal
Government? Many of these questions could leverage the recent workplace
and hiring flexibilities that were implemented in response to the COVID-19
pandemic. New evidence on these questions could guide decisions at agencies
and may also have relevance for employers and organizations beyond the
Federal Government. </OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Recruitment &amp; Hiring </Name><Description>Enhance recruitment and hiring practices</Description><Identifier>_2601b8e4-35cb-11ed-800b-3db1f382ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>What approaches to recruitment and hiring result in high-performing, diverse teams in Federal agencies?
^^
EXAMPLE QUESTIONS:
^^
• What hiring assessments and practices effectively identify qualified
talent, especially in high-need career series? What approaches result
in a positive applicant experience, either leading to acceptance of a
position, or willingness for a qualified (but not-selected) candidate to
apply for other opportunities? To what extent can alternative hiring
mechanisms improve the recruitment of skilled professionals while
reducing the time to hire? Do these approaches lead to more or less
equitable hiring outcomes?
^^
• To what extent, and through what mechanisms (for example,
USAJobs and other application forms and processes, interview
questions and format, time to wait for response or decision), might
specific requirements (including security clearances) impact Federal
recruitment of a diverse, inclusive workforce?
^^
• What barriers to entry into Federal service currently exist for potential
Federal employees? How do these barriers vary across demographic
populations?
^^
• How can the Federal Government organize work, workplaces, and workforces to create a competitive advantage for recruitment and retention? What workplace flexibilities and strategies, including those related to pay and benefits, promote equity, diversity, inclusion, engagement, and performance? </OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Retention &amp; Engagement</Name><Description>Improve retention, engagement, inclusion, belonging, and wellbeing among Federal employees</Description><Identifier>_50a4c478-363a-11ed-b984-e6970583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>What strategies improve retention, engagement, inclusion,
belonging, and wellbeing among Federal employees, while reducing
burnout and attrition?
^^
EXAMPLE QUESTIONS:
^^
• How can the Federal Government be nimbler in understanding the
Federal employee experience? What information do agency leaders
need to improve employee engagement and retention? How can
lessons from customer experience initiatives inform improvements to
the Federal employee experience?
^^
• Which inclusion and belonging interventions reduce burnout and
improve wellbeing and retention, and under what circumstances?
^^
• What management practices advance disability inclusion and
empower Federal employees with disabilities? What management
practices advance inclusion and empowerment of other
underrepresented Federal employees?</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Empowerment &amp; Diversity</Name><Description>Build a strong, empowered, and diverse cohort across the Federal Government employee lifecycle</Description><Identifier>_50a4c5a4-363a-11ed-b984-e6970583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>What approaches build a strong, empowered, and diverse cohort
across the Federal Government employee lifecycle?
^^
EXAMPLE QUESTIONS:
^^
• What management strategies (e.g., delegating authorities, rewarding
innovative risk) can better empower Federal employees to innovate
and solve problems? Which management strategies improve
agency and unit-level organizational health? Which strategies and
approaches are less effective?
^^
• What strategies are effective in boosting career growth (including
rotations, fellowship programs, mentorship programs, and paid
internships)? What approaches to upskilling and reskilling are
effective for retention? Which of these strategies effectively
strengthen a diverse cohort in senior leadership positions and civil
service leadership pipelines? Which strategies and approaches are
less effective?</OtherInformation></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Services</Name><Description>Deliver Excellent, Equitable, and Secure Federal Services and Customer Experience</Description><Identifier>_2601b9ac-35cb-11ed-800b-3db1f382ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Federal Agencies</Name><Description>In their agency Learning Agendas, more than half of agencies included
questions on customer experience and service delivery. A few illustrative
questions from those published agency Learning Agendas:</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Small Business Administration</Name><Description>How do SBA customers feel about their experience with SBA programs and services, and how can the SBA improve this experience, especially for small businesses that are underserved?</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Social Security Administration</Name><Description>What are the effects of simplifying administrative rules and requirements on reducing the burden on program participants and supporting program integrity?</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>United States Department of Agriculture</Name><Description>How effective are existing Rural Development Initiatives (e.g., eliminating
unnecessary paperwork, improving stakeholder outreach, providing technical assistance to applicants, etc.) in improving equitable program access to historically disadvantaged and underserved communities?</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>How can the Federal Government deliver programs and services effectively and build trust?
^^
A key priority of the PMA is to deliver an excellent customer experience through
quality, equitable, and secure Federal services. Every interaction between the
Federal Government and the public, whether it involves renewing a passport,
filing taxes, or calling for a status update on a farm loan application, should be
an opportunity to deliver the value, service, efficiency, and competency that
the public expects and deserves. The Federal Government can build trust by
demonstrating that its processes are fair, secure, effective, and efficient. The
Biden-Harris Administration has already taken steps toward improving the
way Federal agencies deliver services by identifying important life experiences,
such as approaching retirement or recovering from a disaster, that require
interaction with the Federal Government. The selected interactions are crucial
for improving outcomes and reducing burden for all Americans, and can be
found on the Performance.gov customer experience page. However, there are
many unanswered questions about how to best measure trust and understand
how different elements (such as speed, quality, ease, transparency) drive trust
for different types of service interactions.</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Administrative Burdens</Name><Description>Reduce administrative burdens in programs and services</Description><Identifier>_2601ba2e-35cb-11ed-800b-3db1f382ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>How can Federal agencies reduce administrative burdens in
programs and services—including complicated, confusing, and timeconsuming processes people may encounter when trying to access
those programs and services?
^^
EXAMPLE QUESTIONS:
^^
• What approaches effectively reduce unnecessary administrative
burdens for people, especially those that disproportionately affect
underserved communities? What approaches are effective in reducing
burden consistently across different populations?
^^
• How can minimizing administrative burdens also improve upon
objectives of minimizing improper payments and strengthening
program integrity?</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Customer Experiences</Name><Description>Deliver excellent customer experiences with the Federal Government</Description><Identifier>_50a4c676-363a-11ed-b984-e6970583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>What approaches deliver an excellent customer experience with the
Federal Government?
^^
EXAMPLE QUESTIONS:
^^
• What mechanisms for integrated services across different levels
of government, communities, and community organizations are
effective for reducing the burden on and improving outcomes for
customers at specific significant moments in their lives? What kinds
of collaboration between Federal agencies and their program delivery
partners (e.g., State, local, Tribal, Territorial, nonprofit, and industry)
contribute to improved equity and programmatic outcomes?
^^
• How can Government services be more efficiently and effectively
integrated and bundled to better deliver results for people?
^^
• What strategies are effective to support individuals as they navigate
complex Government processes? In what cases do people need
individual support to navigate a complex Government process (e.g., a
community navigator), and when can an automated or virtual process
achieve a similar outcome?</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Trust</Name><Description>Enhance the public’s trust</Description><Identifier>_50a4c7ac-363a-11ed-b984-e6970583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>How can the Federal Government enhance the public’s trust?
^^
EXAMPLE QUESTIONS:
^^
• What methods effectively measure trust in a public service
environment? How and when can customer feedback on their trust in
Government be most useful and accurate?
^^
• How can agencies effectively share and use customer experience data
and program results to promote trust with the public?
^^
• How do various touch points between a person and Government
services affect trust in Government? To what degree is trust affected
by speed (e.g., short hold times for a phone call), transparency (e.g., open data with accessible dashboards), or knowledgeable service
(e.g., staff with expertise to solve a problem)? In those contexts, how
do different modes or styles of communication (e.g., live chat, in
person, over the phone) affect trust? What types of choices in design
and wording throughout service experiences promote inclusivity, and
reduce stigma or other psychological barriers in program delivery?
^^
• What communications strategies (language, channels, frequency)
are effective for building trust? What type of transparency and
accountability efforts have been effective at building trust? Who are
these efforts currently reaching and who do they need to reach to be
effective? Does transparency itself increase public trust? </OtherInformation></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Management</Name><Description>Manage the Business of Government</Description><Identifier>_2601bab0-35cb-11ed-800b-3db1f382ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Federal Agencies</Name><Description>In their agency Learning Agendas, most agencies included questions
on equity. A few illustrative questions from those published agency
Learning Agendas:</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Department of Education</Name><Description>What policies, programs, services, and practices
support the design of learning environments and educational
experiences that are effective in reducing gaps in student
opportunity and achievement — such as those exacerbated by
COVID-19 — including those that are responsive to the assets and
needs of underserved students?</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>U.S. Agency for International Development</Name><Description>How can USAID
more equitably engage local knowledge, assets, and practices, and
align programming with local priorities and metrics for success?</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Department of Housing and Urban Development</Name><Description>How can Federal policy
most effectively support equitable community development,
place-building, and quality of life improvements in American
communities?</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>How can the Federal Government
advance equity and support underserved
communities?
^^
On the first day of the Biden-Harris Administration, President Biden signed
an Executive Order to advance racial equity and support for underserved
communities. This Executive Order calls for a Government-wide effort to
advance equity. The Office of Management and Budget’s report to the President
on leading methods for assessing equity recognizes that equity assessments of
Federal programs represent an expanding, though still nascent, body of work in
public policy, social and data science, and organizational change management.
The Executive Order outlined a vision of equity that promotes fair and just
treatment of all individuals, including those historically underserved, across
a range of dimensions from race, gender, and sexual orientation to geography,
income, and disability. To read more about this work, see the agency equity plan
snapshots and the agency equity assessments. The questions below are focused
on learning how advancing equity can benefit all.</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Services</Name><Description>Advanced equity in the design, delivery, and evaluation of Federal services</Description><Identifier>_2601bb32-35cb-11ed-800b-3db1f382ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>How can equity be advanced in the design, delivery, and evaluation of
Federal services?
^^
EXAMPLE QUESTIONS:
^^
• What approaches effectively improve equitable distribution of grants,
loans, or other time-sensitive Federal funding and benefits programs
from enacted laws (such as the CARES Act (Public Law 116-136), the
American Rescue Plan Act (Public Law 117-2), the Infrastructure
Investment and Jobs Act (Public Law 117-58), and related legislation)
or in response to disasters, climate-related crises, or public health
emergencies? What lessons were learned from the public health and
economic crises of the pandemic that can inform the development
of future Federal programs that are both responsive to a crisis and
deliver equitable outcomes?
^^
• What strategies effectively remove barriers to awareness of, access
to, and delivery of Federal services, particularly for historically
underserved individuals or populations?
^^
• What characteristics of Government procurement, grants, or
contracting structures make them effective for reaching underserved
communities or businesses owned by historically excluded groups?
^^
• What approaches to data collection and analysis could improve
understanding about service utilization among underserved populations?</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Tools &amp; Structures</Name><Description>Identify organizational tools and management structures advance equity</Description><Identifier>_50a4c888-363a-11ed-b984-e6970583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>What organizational tools and management structures advance
equity?
^^
EXAMPLE QUESTIONS:
^^
• What management structures, tools, or trainings for Government
employees effectively improve equity outcomes in an agency’s
operations and mission? Does changing decision-making structures to
include equity-focused practices promote more equitable outcomes?
^^
• What approaches to equity assessments result in Federal agencies
improving equity in the outcomes of their work?</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Organizational Changes</Name><Description>Identify and address underlying barriers to advancing equity</Description><Identifier>_50a4c96e-363a-11ed-b984-e6970583ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>What larger organizational changes in agencies are needed to identify
and address underlying barriers to advancing equity?
^^
EXAMPLE QUESTIONS:
^^
• If agencies engage with traditionally underrepresented stakeholders at
the outset when key decisions are made, does that early engagement
affect outcomes and intended impact (e.g., including those whom
programs are meant to serve at an earlier stage in the design process or
during the definition of eligibility criteria)?
^^
• What are effective approaches that agencies can take in managing the
business of Government to address barriers that have hindered equal
opportunity?</OtherInformation></Objective></Goal></StrategicPlanCore><AdministrativeInformation><StartDate/><EndDate/><PublicationDate>2022-09-16</PublicationDate><Source>https://assets.performance.gov/PMA/PMA-Learning-Agenda.pdf</Source><Submitter><GivenName>Owen</GivenName><Surname>Ambur</Surname><PhoneNumber/><EmailAddress>Owen.Ambur@verizon.net</EmailAddress></Submitter></AdministrativeInformation></PerformancePlanOrReport>