<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../part2stratml.xsl"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="stratmliso.xsl"?>
<StrategicPlan><Name>Implementing Cross-Agency Collaboration: Recommendations for OMB &amp;  Cross-Agency Leaders</Name><Description>Government executives and managers should recognize institutional challenges to cross-agency
collaboration and develop strategies to address them. Effective government executives are
skilled at working around, or in spite of, institutional barriers. But with the passage of the
GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 and the Obama administration’s public commitment to a set
of cross-agency priority goals, a critical mass has been achieved in understanding the growing
importance of cross-agency efforts. As a result, there may be opportunities to directly address
institutional-level changes. The recommendations that follow are of two types: those for policy
makers in the Office of Management and Budget in the White House, and those for managers
in agencies engaged in implementing cross-cutting collaborative initiatives.</Description><OtherInformation/><StrategicPlanCore><Organization><Name>IBM Center for The Business of Government</Name><Acronym>C4BG</Acronym><Identifier>_75eeae68-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><Description>Through research stipends and events, the IBM Center for The Business of Government stimulates research and facilitates discussion of new approaches to improving the effectiveness of government at the federal, state, local, and international levels.</Description><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Jane Fountain</Name><Description>Author -- Professor of Political Science and Public Policy; Director, National Center for Digital Government, University of Massachusetts Amherst -- 
Jane E. Fountain is Professor of Political Science and Public Policy and Adjunct Professor of Computer Science at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Previously, she served for 16 years on the faculty of the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. She is the founder and Director of the National Center for Digital Government and the Science, Technology and Society Initiative, based at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Daniel J. Chenok</Name><Description>Executive Director,
IBM Center for The Business of Government</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Lori Feller</Name><Description>Partner, Public Sector, Organizational Change Management,
IBM Global Business Services</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Public Managers</Name><Description>Public managers effective at cross-agency collaboration need to use both their relationship skills and organizational structures strategically, working within their institutional constraints.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Contributors</Name><Description>Well over 100 public managers agreed to be interviewed for this project and the related, broader research program on cross-agency initiatives. I am grateful to hundreds more for sharing their expertise through surveys, and as part of advising, professional interactions, and executive teaching, especially in 15 years working with members of the Senior Executive Service in the Senior Managers in Government executive program at the Kennedy School of
Government.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>National Center for Digital Government</Name><Description>Faculty colleagues and graduate students at the National Center for Digital Government and beyond during the past decade who have contributed to this research program include David Lazer, Ines Mergel, Maria Binz Scharf, Ramon Gil-Garcia, Robin McKinnon, Amanda Coe, Alexander Schellong, Hirokazu Okumura, Cary Coglianese, Stuart Shulman, Michelle Goncalves, Erdem Erkul, Seok-Jin Eom, Albert Meijer, Peter Haas, Charles Schweik, Raquel Galindo Dorado, Jeffrey Rothschild, Diego Canabarro, and Martha Fuentes-Bautista as well as many others whose research and insights have informed and sharpened the analysis. The author is grateful to David Lazer for helpful suggestions and to Ines Mergel for the network analysis.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>National Science Foundation</Name><Description>This research would not have been possible without the generous support of the National Science Foundation, under grant numbers 0131923 and 0630239. Naturally, the opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations in this report are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.  Grateful acknowledgements to John Kamensky and Mark Abramson for many helpful suggestions.</Description></Stakeholder></Organization><Vision><Description>Cross-agency collaboration occurs efficiently and effectively</Description><Identifier>_75eeafd0-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier></Vision><Mission><Description>To provide recommendations for OMB &amp; cross-agency leaders for implementing cross-agency collaboration </Description><Identifier>_75eeb070-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier></Mission><Value><Name>Interagency Collaboration</Name><Description/></Value><Goal><Name>Incentives</Name><Description>Create the institutional incentives and environment to foster cross-agency collaboration.</Description><Identifier>_75eeb110-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Office of Management and Budget</Name><Description>The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) should provide leadership in creating the institutional
incentives and environment that foster cross-agency collaboration as a way of doing
business, instead of the traditional approach, which has been to treat cross-agency initiatives
as exceptions to the rule.</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/><Objective><Name>Guidance</Name><Description>Develop management guidance for cross-agency collaboration.</Description><Identifier>_75eeb1b0-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType=""><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>In
2012, OMB developed useful guidance to agencies on the use of evidence and evaluation. It
should develop similar guidance to agencies encouraging the use of collaborative approaches. A
knowledge and experience base exists among federal managers and executives, but it has not
been well-articulated and shared. Agency managers require lessons learned, best practice, guidance,
and training to support cross-agency collaboration. OMB should produce templates for
shared budgets based on successful cross-agency experience. GAO has begun to identify mechanisms
and processes used in cross-agency collaborative projects, but these have not been codified
or evaluated. Having a toolkit that includes templates and models of processes that have
worked -- including shared budgets -- would help leaders of cross-agency initiatives navigate new
waters.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Facilitation &amp; Enforcement</Name><Description>Continue to play the dual roles of facilitator and enforcer.</Description><Identifier>_75eeb250-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType=""><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>OMB plays
multiple catalytic roles with respect to cross-agency collaboration. It acts as a facilitator for
cross-agency collaborations and often disseminates promising practices and innovations but,
when necessary, may play a forceful role -- aka "dropping the hammer" -- in demanding compliance
with an administration’s directives to agencies. Collaboration does not mean that
tough political situations and conflicts will not occur. OMB and other oversight agency managers,
as well as political appointees, inevitably have to manage serious and intractable differences
among agencies.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Congressional Engagement</Name><Description>Engage with key members of Congress and their staffs to inform institutional directives that would support cross-agency collaboration.</Description><Identifier>_75eeb2f0-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Political Appointees</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Members of Congress</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Congressional Staff</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Legislative change is a long-term process, but the GPRA Modernization Act and its provisions show promise for legislation that promotes cross-agency
collaboration around results that matter. Traditionally, cross-agency initiatives can face
barriers in sharing resources and legal authority because of the jurisdictional boundaries of
various congressional committees. Proactively identifying and addressing them should be on
the agenda.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Re-Use</Name><Description>Continue to search for ways to "build once, use many."</Description><Identifier>_75eeb39a-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Office of E-Government and Information Technology</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>The OMB
Office of E-Government and Information Technology should identify shared systems and cyber
infrastructure that could be reused, with modifications, to further cross-agency streamlining
and collaboration. A recent example is the use of e-Rulemaking information systems that have
been modified to develop the new Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) online system that
tracks FOIA requests and their status across agencies. This reuse has saved millions of dollars
in new system development costs and sped its implementation.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Cross-Agency Capacity</Name><Description>Add cross-agency capacity building into the performance evaluation systems
of the Senior Executive Service (SES).</Description><Identifier>_75eeb444-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1.5</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Senior Executive Service Members</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>OMB</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Office of Personnel Management</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>OMB, working with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and
agencies, should add cross-agency capacity building into the performance evaluation systems
of the Senior Executive Service (SES). OMB should work with OPM and agencies to
proactively certify performance appraisal systems, including pay for performance, that recognize
and reward participation in cross-agency collaborative efforts. In keeping with the GPRA
Modernization Act's legislative directive that OPM develop a list of skills and competencies
required for sustainable cross-agency collaboration, those skills should be incorporated into
performance appraisal, training, rewards, and selection criteria for the SES. Cross-boundary
and relationship management skills should be core skills for the SES.</OtherInformation></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Cross-Agency Initiatives</Name><Description>Undertake actions on cross-agency initiatives.</Description><Identifier>_75eeb4ee-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Federal Agencies</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Cross-Agency Leaders</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>For executives who are assigned to build a major cross-agency effort, what do they do? The six recommendations below present key actions that government executives leading cross-agency initiatives should undertake.</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Direction &amp; Goals</Name><Description>Set and communicate clear, compelling direction and goals.</Description><Identifier>_75eeb5ac-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType=""><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Build
commitment to a cross-agency vision, mission, long and near-term goals, and objectives.
Frame the effort, set the direction, and establish the culture as one that requires collaboration.
Convince key managers that the new collaboration will produce better results than the status
quo. An important overarching goal, a vision of the future, is a strong motivator and provides
the initial logic for organizing the initiative. Keep the overarching goal and its benefits at the
forefront through communication and framing.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Working Groups</Name><Description>Fit the working group structure to the task.</Description><Identifier>_75eeb656-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Working Groups</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Collaborative initiatives
require different types of authority structures and division of labor, depending upon scale,
scope, urgency, and core task dimensions. Decide on an appropriate structure and define
exactly what that will mean in terms of authority, resources, and division of labor. For example,
some cross-agency collaborations are organized with a lead agency that supplies services
on a fee-for-service basis to other agencies. The cross-agency priority (CAP) goals by law are
led by a White House official, but the organizational structure of the cross-agency relationships
is left undetermined. The lead agency or managing partner approach differs across projects
with respect to how much joint decision-making and problem-solving will be used.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Roles &amp; Responsibilities</Name><Description>Establish specific roles and responsibilities.</Description><Identifier>_75eeb70a-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Who will do what? Who is responsible for what? Develop clear decision-making processes including conflict resolution measures. Cross-agency collaborations require strong executive and management groups and well-organized working groups.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Agreements</Name><Description>Develop formal agreements.</Description><Identifier>_75eeb7dc-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Codification</Name><Description>Codify in writing what is to be accomplished, the principal means and the timeline for accomplishment.</Description><Identifier>_75eeb890-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.4.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Formalization</Name><Description>Formalize the collaborative arrangement.</Description><Identifier>_75eeb94e-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.4.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Revisit this document frequently. Making formal agreements public provides
accountability and transparency. It exerts pressure on cross-agency members to fulfill commitments.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Work Plans</Name><Description>As part of the formal agreement, create a work plan working backward from major
goals to establish interim goals and milestones.</Description><Identifier>_75eeba48-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.4.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Deadlines</Name><Description>Establish and enforce clear deadlines.</Description><Identifier>_75eebb10-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.4.4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Sharing</Name><Description>Develop shared operations and shared resources that support achieving
the goal.</Description><Identifier>_75eebbce-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.5</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>These range from production of shared brochures and web pages to development of shared systems and standards; co-location, shared services and information; fee-for-service operations; standardizing and streamlining to produce consistent operations across agencies; and consolidation. For joint policy making efforts, coordination across agencies that share responsibility for key policy challenges -- such as the CAP goals -- may mean communication
and joint planning to align strategies that are then implemented in parallel.
Many cross-agency projects have had to generate their own resources through sharing, borrowing, or otherwise leveraging existing resources. Similarly, many have been staffed with those on short-term details from several agencies. Canny federal managers are excellent at bootstrapping until more consistent resources are available. Moreover, cross-agency collaborations
must explicitly develop and include key internal stakeholders and external stakeholders (clients and constituents) to mobilize support.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Metrics</Name><Description>Build shared performance metrics.</Description><Identifier>_75eebcaa-2e96-11e6-8053-141702a5173d</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2.6</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>The Exports cross-agency collaboration has developed cross-agency performance metrics for exports. These may provide an impetus for other efforts. Performance measures are needed to enable tracking, monitoring, and
measurement/evaluation of output and outcomes across agencies and programs. Measurement is important, but without consequences, measurements lack force. Align incentives, rewards, and sanctions.</OtherInformation></Objective></Goal></StrategicPlanCore><AdministrativeInformation><PublicationDate>2016-06-09</PublicationDate><Source>http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/Implementing%20Cross%20Agency%20Collaboration.pdf</Source><Submitter><GivenName>Owen</GivenName><Surname>Ambur</Surname><PhoneNumber/><EmailAddress>Owen.Ambur@verizon.net</EmailAddress></Submitter></AdministrativeInformation></StrategicPlan>
