FACA Committee Purpose & Justification The information in this plan was imported from the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) database and transformed into StratML Part 1, Strategic Plan, format. Fiscal Year:2011 Committee Type: Grant Review Proposal Review Panel for Industrial Innovation and Partnerships NSF 0a1e033b-5563-44c7-aaa8-abced7fe8f88 [ Location : (http://stratml.fido.gov/dick/NSFFACA28164.xml) ][ Federated Name : (urn:nsf.gov:agency:53:committee:28164:) ][ Agency Name : (National Science Foundation) ][ Agency Acronym : (NSF) ][ Agency Domain : (nsf.gov) ] [ Agency Web Site : (http://nsf.gov ) ][ Committee Name : (Proposal Review Panel for Industrial Innovation and Partnerships) ][ Committee Type : (Grant Review) ][ Committee Web Site : () ][ Goal? : (yes) ][ Vision? : (yes) ][ Mission? : (yes) ] National Science Foundation http://nsf.gov Members are selected to be representative of the scientific areas encompassed by IIP activities. Every effort is made to achieve a diverse membership with representation including individuals from underrepresented groups and different geographic regions Advise the National Science Foundation (NSF) on the merit of proposals requesting financial support for research and research- related activities. The panel will review proposals submitted to NSF under the purview of the Division of Industrial Innovation and Partnerships (IIP). Review and evaluate proposals, which may include site visits, and provide written recommendations on proposals as part of the selection process for awards. May evaluate and provide advice on the progress of awarded proposals 78d4c946-cfc5-4b4f-b238-3d1061ea24f8 The NSF mission is set out in the NSF Act of 1950 authorizes and directs the Agency to initiate and support: basic scientific research and research fundamental to the engineering process; and science and engineering education programs at all levels and in all fields of science and engineering. The involvement of knowledgeable peers from outside the Foundation in the review of proposals is the keystone of NSF’s proposal review system. Their judgments of the extent to which proposals address the merit review criteria are vital for informing NSF staff and influencing funding recommendations. e03f8581-f210-404a-9dfb-f65a80c555e3 The panel provides the unique opportunity for the reviewers to provide judgments about the comparative merits within a group of proposals and advice to the Program Officers on the merits of each proposal. Ad hoc mail reviewers can be chosen to give a thorough technical review of a proposal, mail reviewer judgments are normally made about a single proposal viewed in isolation. e3102b97-0297-4551-bb9c-b9919bee5c3b 43e72a74-837d-4f4e-adc4-ee1d15ceea64 42e274b8-285d-4f13-b684-423a77380273 2010-10-01 2011-09-30 2013-07-09 http://explore.data.gov/resource/datasets/c5i3-bb9j Gannon (J.) Dick gannon_dick@yahoo.com