<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../part2stratml.xsl"?><StrategicPlan><Name>About PPR</Name><Description/><OtherInformation/><StrategicPlanCore><Organization><Name>The Project on Political Reform</Name><Acronym>PPR</Acronym><Identifier>_fc2496f4-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><Description>Non-partisan in orientation, the Project on Political Reform investigates the sources of government dysfunction and identifies pragmatic solutions. PPR’s focus includes topics such as legislative decision-making, lobbying, political accountability, campaign laws and practices, structural incentives influencing candidate and office-holder behavior, and the relationships between governing institutions. </Description><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Marc Farinella</Name><Description>Executive Director</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Harris School of Public Policy</Name><Description>University of Chicago</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Local Governments</Name><Description>PPR focuses primarily on local, state and federal government in the United States but, at times, may also address governmental dysfunction in other western democracies.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>State Governments</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Federal Government </Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Western Democracies</Name><Description/></Stakeholder></Organization><Vision><Description/><Identifier>_fc2497f8-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier></Vision><Mission><Description>To investigate the sources of government dysfunction and identifies pragmatic solutions.</Description><Identifier>_fc2498a2-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier></Mission><Value><Name>Workable Governance</Name><Description>Even in this era of hyper-partisanship, Democrats, Republicans, and Independents can agree on one thing: government in the United States is broken. Evidence of political dysfunction abounds. Every night on the news, we see partisan squabbling and empty posturing.</Description></Value><Value><Name>Effectiveness</Name><Description>More alarming, though, is the fact that our government too often fails to take effective action on issues of critical importance to America’s future. On a whole host of issues -- from climate change to a mystifying tax code that runs into the thousands of pages -- the government routinely ignores plain warnings of impending danger, mismanagement, corruption, and waste. Even on issues of everyday governance, like passing a budget, paying its debt obligations, and respecting deficit restrictions, government does not so much govern as it lurches from crisis to crisis. </Description></Value><Value><Name>Problem Solving</Name><Description>Meanwhile, when it does manage to build the supermajorities needed to pass laws, the government tends to produce policies that are internally inconsistent and ineffective. And when these programs and policies are shown to have fixable flaws, the flaws too often don’t get fixed. Based on the assembled evidence, it is not at all clear that our government is up to the task of solving the problems of a modern, complex society.</Description></Value><Value><Name>Understanding</Name><Description>In response to all of this dysfunction, political observers have offered any number of reforms. Term limits, lobbying restrictions, electoral reforms, institutional reorganizations, and much more have all been presented as salves to contemporary dissatisfaction. Each may have some promise. But if reforms are to be successful, they must be based on a clear understanding of what is actually wrong.</Description></Value><Value><Name>Productivity</Name><Description>For only when it is understood why a system is performing poorly can we know with confidence what changes will be most productive.</Description></Value><Value><Name>Reform</Name><Description>Given the stakes, public policy schools need to become the center of responsible discussions about political reform. They must investigate the sources of government dysfunction, evaluate the merits of existing reform proposals, and craft new proposals based on data, research and scholarship. </Description></Value><Goal><Name>Legislation</Name><Description>Investigate dysfunctional legislative decision-making and identify solutions.</Description><Identifier>_fc249a50-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Congress</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>State Legislatures</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/><Objective><Name/><Description/><Identifier>_fc249b40-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator/><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Lobbying</Name><Description>Investigate dysfunctional lobbying and identify solutions.</Description><Identifier>_fc249bf4-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/><Objective><Name/><Description/><Identifier>_fc249cb2-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator/><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Political Accountability</Name><Description>Investigate dysfunctional political accountability and identify solutions.</Description><Identifier>_fc249d66-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Politicians</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Elected Officials</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Candidates for Elective Office</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/><Objective><Name/><Description/><Identifier>_fc249e1a-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator/><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Political Campaigns</Name><Description>Investigate dysfunctional campaign laws and practices and identify solutions.</Description><Identifier>_fc249ef6-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/><Objective><Name/><Description/><Identifier>_fc249fbe-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator/><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Incentives</Name><Description>Investigate dysfunctional structural incentives influencing candidate and office-holder behavior and identify solutions.</Description><Identifier>_fc24a072-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>5</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Candidates for Elective Office</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Elected Office Holders</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/><Objective><Name/><Description/><Identifier>_fc24a130-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator/><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Governance Relationships</Name><Description>Investigate dysfunctional relationships between governing institutions and identify solutions.</Description><Identifier>_fc24a1e4-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>6</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Governing Institutions</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/><Objective><Name/><Description/><Identifier>_fc24a2a2-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator/><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Political Polarization</Name><Description>Mitigate political polarization in the United States and/or its damaging repercussions.</Description><Identifier>_fc24a3c4-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Nathaniel Persily</Name><Description>Note: Many of [these] ideas are addressed in depth in the essays compiled in Solutions to Political Polarization in America, Cambridge University Press, 2015, edited by Nathaniel Persily. This book is an excellent starting point for anyone wishing to learn more about polarization and proposed solutions.</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>The Project on Political Reform at the University of Chicago's Harris School of Public Policy is looking for new ideas -- big or small -- on how to mitigate political polarization in the United States and/or its damaging repercussions.There continues to be debate over the nature and scope of political polarization in the U.S.  Some researchers contend that the American population is not significantly more polarized on public policy issues than normal historical parameters but, rather, polarization seems greater due to geographic and partisan sorting. Many argue that heightened polarization is largely confined to officeholders, political elites and activists. But others contend that the broader population has become more polarized on public policy matters.Further, for some, political polarization manifests as incivility, gridlock, and/or hyper-partisanship rather than heighten separation on policy preferences.For the purposes of this call, we accept your lens. We are interested in your ideas on how to address political polarization as you see it.Please note that political viability is a crucial consideration. The more politically viable, the more valuable the idea.To stimulate thought, we've created a list of ideas that have been suggested by various scholars and authors [documented as objectives in this StratML rendition].</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Elections</Name><Description>Reform the Election Process</Description><Identifier>_fc24a482-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Party Choice</Name><Description>Abolish primary elections and let state and local party organizations choose nominees.</Description><Identifier>_fc24a54a-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.1.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Closed Primaries</Name><Description>Get rid of closed primaries.</Description><Identifier>_fc24a61c-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.1.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Unified Primary Elections</Name><Description>Adopt a top-two or top-four unified primary election – open to all registered voters -- in which the top vote-getters regardless of party advance to the general election.</Description><Identifier>_fc24a6e4-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.1.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>(ex.: California; Washington)</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Instant Run-Offs</Name><Description>Adopt instant run-off elections.</Description><Identifier>_fc24a7a2-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.1.4 </SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Party Endorsements</Name><Description>End the official neutrality of party organizations in primary elections and instead encourage (when useful) party organizations to endorse candidates in primary elections, thereby allowing certain candidates to use the party "brand."</Description><Identifier>_fc24a87e-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.1.5</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Party Organizations</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Presidential Elections</Name><Description>Elect members of Congress only in presidential election years.</Description><Identifier>_fc24a9b4-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.1.6</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Members of Congress</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Non-Partisan Ballots</Name><Description>Adopt non-partisan ballots such as those commonly used at the municipal level.</Description><Identifier>_fc24aa86-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.1.7</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Proportionality</Name><Description>Assure Proportionality</Description><Identifier>_fc24ab62-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Reservations</Name><Description>Reserve some seats for allocation to the party receiving the most votes if the party receiving the most votes does not also win the most seats.</Description><Identifier>_fc24ac34-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.2.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Representation</Name><Description>Adopt proportional representation.</Description><Identifier>_fc24ad06-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.2.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Redistricting</Name><Description>Make the Redistricting Process Less Partisan</Description><Identifier>_fc24ade2-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Commissions</Name><Description>Authorize impartial commissions to draw election district boundaries in order to stop gerrymandering.</Description><Identifier>_fc24aeb4-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.3.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Redistricting Commissions</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Turnout</Name><Description>Increase Turnout</Description><Identifier>_fc24af90-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Coercion</Name><Description>Make voting mandatory.</Description><Identifier>_fc24b076-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.4.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Incentives</Name><Description>Adopt a lottery or other incentives to increase voter turnout.</Description><Identifier>_fc24b148-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.4.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Voters</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Voter Suppression</Name><Description>Stop voter suppression.</Description><Identifier>_fc24b224-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.4.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Primary Elections</Name><Description>Specify a single date when all states would hold their non-presidential primary elections.</Description><Identifier>_fc24b314-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.4.4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>States</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>GOTV</Name><Description>Construct GOTV efforts that target moderate voters who frequently do not vote.</Description><Identifier>_fc24b3f0-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.4.5</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Moderate Voters</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Campaign Finance</Name><Description>Reform the Campaign Finance System. </Description><Identifier>_fc24b4d6-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.5</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Candidate Campaign Committees</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Political Parties</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Politically Independent Organizations</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>The intention of some of these reform ideas is to strengthen candidate campaign committees and/or parties relative to outside groups.</OtherInformation></Objective><Objective><Name>Public Financing</Name><Description/><Identifier>_fc24b5c6-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.5.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Political Campaign Organizations</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Political Campaigns</Name><Description>Adopt public financing of political campaigns.</Description><Identifier>_fc24b6ac-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.5.1.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Political Parties</Name><Description>Adopt public financing of campaigns with the funds channeled through political party organizations.</Description><Identifier>_fc24b792-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.5.1.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Political Party Organizations</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Vouchers</Name><Description>Allow voters to allocate public funds to candidates or multi-candidate PACs through vouchers.</Description><Identifier>_fc24b88c-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.5.1.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Candidates for Elective Office</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Multi-Candidate PACs</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Contribution Limits</Name><Description/><Identifier>_fc24b97c-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.5.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Restrictions</Name><Description>Place stricter limits on contributions where limits are high or non-existent.</Description><Identifier>_fc24ba62-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.5.2.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Candidate Committees</Name><Description>Raise limits for contributions to official candidate campaign committees.</Description><Identifier>_fc24bb8e-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.5.2.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Candidate Campaign Committees</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Political Donors</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Political Parties</Name><Description>Raise limits for contributions to political parties.</Description><Identifier>_fc24bc7e-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.5.2.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Political Parties</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Political Contributers</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Soft Money</Name><Description>Restore the "soft money" loophole for party organizations.</Description><Identifier>_fc24bd78-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.5.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Party Organizations</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Independent Groups</Name><Description/><Identifier>_fc24be7c-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.5.4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Independent Groups</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Campaign Spending</Name><Description>Limit campaign spending by independent groups.</Description><Identifier>_fc24bf76-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.5.4.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Campaign Contributions</Name><Description>Limit contributions to independent groups.</Description><Identifier>_fc24c066-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.5.4.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Independent Groups</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Legislative Processes</Name><Description>Reform the Legislative Process</Description><Identifier>_fc24c174-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.6</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Filibusters</Name><Description>Reform filibustering in the Senate.</Description><Identifier>_fc24c278-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.6.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>U.S. Senate</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Abolition</Name><Description>Abolish the filibuster.</Description><Identifier>_fc24c372-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.6.1.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Affirmation</Name><Description>Instead of filibuster and cloture, require 41 Senators to vote to stop a vote on a bill.</Description><Identifier>_fc24c48a-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.6.1.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Talking</Name><Description>Require filibusters to be "talking" filibusters.</Description><Identifier>_fc24c58e-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.6.1.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Speaker of the House</Name><Description>Adopt supermajority selection of the Speaker of the House.</Description><Identifier>_fc24c688-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.6.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>U.S. House of Representatives</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Speaker of the House</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Earmarks</Name><Description>Reinstitute earmarks.</Description><Identifier>_fc24c7a0-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.6.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Parliamentarianism</Name><Description>Adopt a parliamentary system.</Description><Identifier>_fc24c8a4-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.6.4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Transparency</Name><Description>Reduce transparency, allowing more latitude for negotiation and compromise.</Description><Identifier>_fc24c9a8-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.6.5</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Judicial Appointments</Name><Description>For federal judicial appointments, remove the supermajority requirement and instead adopt a storable vote system that allows senators to cast multiple votes (from their aggregate judicial vote budget) for nominees they strongly support or oppose.</Description><Identifier>_fc24caca-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.6.6</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Federal Judges</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>U.S. Senators</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Debt Ceiling</Name><Description>Eliminate the debt ceiling.</Description><Identifier>_fc24cbd8-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.6.7</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Single-Tracking</Name><Description>Make obstruction more costly by reinstating single-tracking in the Senate so that the Senate cannot have two or more pieces of legislation pending on the floor at the same time.</Description><Identifier>_fc24ccdc-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.6.8</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>U.S. Senate</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Interparty Relationships</Name><Description>Promote and encourage repeated interparty interactions and facilitate interparty relationships among legislators.</Description><Identifier>_fc24ce08-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.6.9</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Legislators</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Voting</Name><Description>Improve Voter Knowledge and Encourage Voter Respect for Differing Perspectives</Description><Identifier>_fc24cf16-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.7</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Voters</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Data Science</Name><Description>Use data science to extract and summarize information from campaign finances records and other large data sets in order to provide better informational cues to voters.</Description><Identifier>_fc24d06a-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.7.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Voters</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Political Campaign Organzations</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Political Contributors</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Viewpoints</Name><Description>Work with news organizations and social media websites to develop tools and strategies that facilitate more thoughtful, balanced and respectful consideration (by their audiences) of differing viewpoints.</Description><Identifier>_fc24d1a0-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.7.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>News Organizations</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Social Media</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Fact-Checking</Name><Description>Strengthen fact-checking initiatives.</Description><Identifier>_fc24d2b8-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.7.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Civic Education &amp; News</Name><Description>Expand civic education and civic news exposure among young people.</Description><Identifier>_fc24d3c6-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.7.4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Young People</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Age-Relevancy</Name><Description>Increase interest by utilizing age-relevant content.</Description><Identifier>_fc24d4fc-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.7.4.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Other Reforms</Name><Description>Adopt additional reforms</Description><Identifier>_fc24d61e-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.8</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Centrist Party</Name><Description>Create a (most likely small or regional) Centrist Party which might change the dynamics in Congress.</Description><Identifier>_fc24d736-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.8.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name>Centrist Party</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Incumbency</Name><Description>Incentivize incumbents to seek re-election and stay in office longer.</Description><Identifier>_fc24d876-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.8.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Log-Rolling</Name><Description>Encourage public acceptance of the need for log-rolling (i.e. side payments) when such side payments are legitimate and in the public interest.</Description><Identifier>_fc24d98e-6216-11e8-95f0-c093f0613715</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>7.8.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Organization"><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal></StrategicPlanCore><AdministrativeInformation><PublicationDate>2018-05-27</PublicationDate><Source>https://harris.uchicago.edu/research-impact/centers/project-political-reform/about-ppr</Source><Submitter><GivenName>Owen</GivenName><Surname>Ambur</Surname><PhoneNumber/><EmailAddress>Owen.Ambur@verizon.net</EmailAddress></Submitter></AdministrativeInformation></StrategicPlan>
