<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../part2stratml.xsl"?><PerformancePlanOrReport>   <Name>FACA Committee Purpose ;amp;amp; Justification</Name>   <Description>   The information in this plan was imported from the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) database   and transformed into StratML Part 1, Strategic Plan, format.   </Description>   <OtherInformation> Fiscal Year:2011 Committee Type: Non Scientific Program Advisory Board</OtherInformation>   <StrategicPlanCore>      <Organization>         <Name>Olympic Peninsula Provincial Advisory Committee</Name>         <Acronym>USDA</Acronym>         <Identifier>0a1e033b-5563-44c7-aaa8-abced7fe8f88</Identifier>         <Description>[ Location : (http://stratml.fido.gov/dick/USDAFACA7252.xml) ][ Federated Name : (urn:www.usda.gov:agency:67:committee:7252:) ][ Agency Name : (Department of Agriculture) ][ Agency Acronym : (USDA) ][ Agency Domain : (www.usda.gov) ] [ Agency Web Site : (http://www.usda.gov/) ][ Committee Name : (Olympic Peninsula Provincial Advisory Committee) ][ Committee Type : (Non Scientific Program Advisory Board) ][ Committee Web Site : () ][ Goal? : (yes) ][ Vision? : (yes) ][ Mission? : (yes) ]         </Description>         <Stakeholder>            <Name>Department of Agriculture</Name>            <Description>http://www.usda.gov/	</Description>            <Role>               <Name/>               <Description/>               <RoleType/>            </Role>         </Stakeholder>         <Stakeholder>            <Name>On September 30, 1994, USDA published the NOI in the Federal Register announcing the Pacific Northwest Forest Plan. The Federal agencies affected by the plan formed 12 groups called the Provincial Interagency Executive Committees or PIECs for each of the 12 provinces identified in the plan. The charter lists interests that need to be represented on each of the 12 provincial advisory committees as follows:1 rep. from the Environment Protection Agency; 1 rep. from the USDA Forest Service; 1 rep. from the Bureau of Land Management; 1 rep. from the National Park Service; 1 rep. from the Bureau of Indian Affairs; 1 rep. from State government; 1 rep. from each county where province is located (maximum of 3); up to 3 reps. from Tribal government; 2 reps. from environmental interests; 2 reps. from the forest products industry; reps. from the recreation and tourism industry; 3 to 5 reps from fish, wildlife, or forestry conservation organization such as the Bureau of Reclamation, National Biological Survey, Forest Service Research, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Geological Survey, Bonneville Power Administration, Department of Defense, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service.</Name>            <Description/>            <Role>               <Name/>               <Description/>               <RoleType/>            </Role>         </Stakeholder>      </Organization>      <Vision>         <Description>The Provincial Advisory Committee was formed to advise seven federal agencies concerning implementation decisions and details pertaining to the Northwest Forest Plan (applicable to federal forests in Western Washington, Oregon and Northern California). The PACs identify concerns, which in turn are used to recommend budgeting priorities for available federal funds on key elements of the plan such as watershed restoration, watershed analysis, and subsequent project planning efforts. Advice is tailored to site specific areas in the plan area. Intergovernmental and public relationships improve significantly as a result of these advisory committee meetings.</Description>         <Identifier>78d4c946-cfc5-4b4f-b238-3d1061ea24f8</Identifier>      </Vision>      <Mission>         <Description>The Provincial Advisory Committee was formed to advise seven federal agencies concerning implementation decisions and details pertaining to the Northwest Forest Plan (applicable to federal forests in Western Washington, Oregon and Northern California). The PACs identify concerns, which in turn are used to recommend budgeting priorities for available federal funds on key elements of the plan such as watershed restoration, watershed analysis, and subsequent project planning efforts. Advice is tailored to site specific areas in the plan area. Intergovernmental and public relationships improve significantly as a result of these advisory committee meetings.Since 1994, the Provincial Advisory Committees and Provincial Interagency Executive Committees have met for the purpose of facilitating the successful implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan. There are 12 Provincial Advisory Committees in Oregon, Washington, and Northern California.</Description>         <Identifier>e03f8581-f210-404a-9dfb-f65a80c555e3</Identifier>      </Mission>      <Value>         <Name/>         <Description/>      </Value>      <Goal>         <Name/>         <Description>The complex nature of natural resource management in the Pacific Northwest and the subsequent Pacfic Northwest Forest Plan developed to guide the management of the region's natural resources require close cooperation among the many agencies having a management responsibility in the area and a forum where the public's views may be heard. The PACs provide an opportunity for Federal managers and the public to discuss the issues they identify and to offer advice and recommendations to decision makers on how to address those issues. Common effort and working together through the committee structure give rise to a synergy that brings better management of the provinces set up in the plan.</Description>         <Identifier>e3102b97-0297-4551-bb9c-b9919bee5c3b</Identifier>         <SequenceIndicator/>         <OtherInformation/>         <Stakeholder>            <Name/>            <Description/>            <Role>               <Name/>               <Description/>               <RoleType/>            </Role>         </Stakeholder>         <Objective>            <Name/>            <Description/>            <Identifier>43e72a74-837d-4f4e-adc4-ee1d15ceea64</Identifier>            <SequenceIndicator/>            <OtherInformation/>            <Stakeholder>               <Name/>               <Description/>               <Role>                  <Name/>                  <Description/>                  <RoleType/>               </Role>            </Stakeholder>            <PerformanceIndicator IndicatorType="" ValueChainStage="">               <Identifier>42e274b8-285d-4f13-b684-423a77380273</Identifier>               <MeasurementDimension/>               <UnitOfMeasurement/>               <OtherInformation/>               <Relationship RelationshipType="">                  <Identifier/>                  <Name/>                  <Description/>               </Relationship>               <MeasurementInstance>                  <TargetResult>                     <Description/>                     <NumberOfUnits/>                     <StartDate/>                     <EndDate/>                  </TargetResult>                  <ActualResult>                     <Description/>                     <NumberOfUnits/>                     <StartDate/>                     <EndDate/>                  </ActualResult>               </MeasurementInstance>            </PerformanceIndicator>         </Objective>      </Goal>   </StrategicPlanCore>   <AdministrativeInformation>      <StartDate>2010-10-01</StartDate>      <EndDate>2011-09-30</EndDate>      <PublicationDate>2013-07-09</PublicationDate>      <Source>http://explore.data.gov/resource/datasets/c5i3-bb9j</Source>   </AdministrativeInformation>   <Submitter>      <FirstName>Gannon (J.)</FirstName>      <LastName>Dick</LastName>      <PhoneNumber/>      <EmailAddress>gannon_dick@yahoo.com</EmailAddress>   </Submitter></PerformancePlanOrReport>
