<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../part2stratml.xsl"?><PerformancePlanOrReport><Name>About W3C Groups</Name><Description>A variety of W3C groups enable W3C to pursue its mission through the creation of Web standards, guidelines, and supporting materials. Community and Business Groups offer more ways for innovators to bring work to W3C.</Description><OtherInformation>[Submitter's Note:  The mission statements have not been captured for all of the 337 Community Groups.  Those for the rest of them can be viewed at https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/]</OtherInformation><StrategicPlanCore><Organization><Name>World Wide Web Consortium</Name><Acronym>W3C</Acronym><Identifier>_ba25b042-92e3-4875-a5d5-389a1f54c910</Identifier><Description/><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder></Organization><Vision><Description/><Identifier>_5a594bde-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier></Vision><Mission><Description>To document the roles of W3C groups</Description><Identifier>_5a594cec-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier></Mission><Value><Name/><Description/></Value><Goal><Name>Deliverables</Name><Description>Produce deliverables</Description><Identifier>_5a594da0-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>W3C Working Groups</Name><Description>Working Groups typically produce deliverables (e.g., standards track technical reports, software, test suites, and reviews of the deliverables of other groups)...There are currently 37 open Working Groups.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Accessibility Education and Outreach Working Group (EOWG)</Name><Description>The mission of the Accessibility Education and Outreach Working Group is to develop strategies and resources to promote awareness, understanding, implementation, and conformance testing for W3C accessibility standards; and to support the accessibility work of other W3C Groups.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Accessibility Guidelines Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (AG WG) is to develop specifications to make content on the Web accessible for people with disabilities and to participate in the development and maintenance of implementation support materials for the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group (APA WG, formerly part of the Protocols and Formats Working Group) is to ensure W3C specifications provide support for accessibility to people with disabilities. The group advances this mission through review of W3C specifications, development of technical support materials, collaboration with other Working Groups, and coordination of harmonized accessibility strategies within W3C.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group (ARIA WG, formerly part of the Protocols and Formats Working Group) is to develop technologies that enhance accessibility of web content for people with disabilities. This includes continued development of the Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) suite of technologies and other technical specifications when needed to bridge known gaps.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Audio Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Audio Working Group is to add advanced sound and music synthesis capabilities to the Open Web Platform.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Automotive Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Automotive Working Group is to develop Open Web Platform specifications for application developers, including but not limited to HTML5/JavaScript, enabling Web connectivity through in-vehicle infotainment systems and vehicle data access protocols. The API is agnostic with regard to the connection used.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Browser Testing and Tools Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Browser Testing and Tools Working Group is to produce technologies for use in testing, debugging, and troubleshooting of Web applications running in Web browsers.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the group is to develop and maintain CSS.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Dataset Exchange Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Dataset Exchange WG is to: 1. Maintain and revise the Data Catalog Vocabulary, DCAT, taking into account feature requests from the DCAT user community. 2. Define and publish guidance on the specification and use of application profiles when requesting and serving data on the Web.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Decentralized Identifier Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Decentralized Identifier Working Group is to standardize the DID URI scheme, the data model and syntax of DID Documents, which contain information related to DIDs that enable the aforementioned initial use cases, and the requirements for DID Method specifications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Devices and Sensors Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Device and Sensors Working Group is to create client-side APIs that enable the development of Web Applications that interact with device hardware, sensors, services and applications such as the camera, microphone, proximity sensors, native address books, calendars and native messaging applications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Distributed Tracing Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Distributed Tracing is to define standards for interoperability between tracing tools.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>EPUB 3 Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the EPUB 3 Working Group is to maintain and develop the EPUB 3 family of specifications, to represent the EPUB community in the W3C, and to support EPUB 3 content creators and consumers by further advancing, refining, and clarifying the current EPUB 3 specification.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>GPU for the Web Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the GPU for the Web Working Group is to provide an interface between the Web Platform and modern 3D graphics and computation capabilities present on native system platforms.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>HTML Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the HTML Working Group is to give input to and bring the WHATWG HTML and DOM Review Drafts to W3C Recommendations.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Immersive Web Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Immersive Web Working Group is to help bring high-performance Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) (collectively known as XR) to the open Web via APIs to interact with XR devices and sensors in browsers.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Internationalization Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Internationalization Working Group is to enable universal access to the World Wide Web by proposing and coordinating the adoption by the W3C of techniques, conventions, technologies, and designs that enable and enhance the use of W3C technology and the Web worldwide, with and between various different languages, scripts, regions, and cultures.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>JSON-LD Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the JSON-LD Working Group is to maintain the family of JSON-LD 1.1 Recommendations and related Working Group Notes.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Media Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Media Working Group is to develop and improve client-side media processing and playback features on the Web.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Pointer Events Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Pointer Events Working Group is to provide methods to enable simple device independent input from pointing devices such as mouse, pen, and multi-touch screen.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Publishing Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Publishing Working Group is to enable all publications—with all their specificities and traditions—to become first-class entities on the Web. The group will provide the necessary technologies on the Open Web Platform to make the combination of traditional publishing and the Web complete in terms of accessibility, usability, portability, distribution, archiving, offline access, and reliable cross referencing.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Second Screen Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Second Screen Working Group is to provide specifications that enable web pages to use secondary screens to display web content.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Service Workers Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Service Workers Working Group is to enable Web applications to take advantage of persistent background processing, including hooks to enable bootstrapping of web applications while offline.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>SVG Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) Working Group is to develop and maintain SVG.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Timed Text Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Timed Text Working Group is to develop W3C Recommendations for media online captioning by developing and maintaining new versions of the Timed Text Markup Language (TTML) and WebVTT (Web Video Text Tracks) based on implementation experience and interoperability feedback, and the creation of semantic mappings between those languages.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Verifiable Credentials Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Verifiable Credentials Working Group is to maintain the Verifiable Credentials Data Model specification and related Working Group Notes.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Application Security Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Web Application Security Working Group is to develop security and policy mechanisms to improve the security of Web Applications, and enable secure cross-site communication.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Applications Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Web Applications Working Group (WebApps WG) is to produce specifications that facilitate the development of client-side web applications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Authentication Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Web Authentication Working Group, in the Security Activity is to define a client-side API providing strong authentication functionality to Web Applications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Fonts Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Web Fonts Working Group is to develop specifications that allow the interoperable deployment of downloadable fonts on the Web.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web of Things Working Group</Name><Description>The Web of Things seeks to counter the fragmentation of the IoT through standard complementing building blocks (e.g., metadata and APIs) that enable easy integration across IoT platforms and application domains.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Payments Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Web Payments Working Group is to make payments easier and more secure on the Web.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Performance Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Web Performance Working Group is to provide methods to measure aspects of application performance of user agent features and APIs.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Platform Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Web Platform Working Group is to continue the development of the HTML language and provide specifications that enable improved client-side application development on the Web, including application programming interfaces (APIs) for client-side development and markup vocabularies for describing and controlling client-side application behavior.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Real-Time Communications Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Web Real-Time Communications Working Group is to define client-side APIs to enable Real-Time Communications in Web browsers. These APIs should enable building applications that can be run inside a browser, requiring no extra downloads or plugins, that allow communication between parties using audio, video and supplementary real-time communication, without having to use intervening servers.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>WebAssembly Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the WebAssembly Working Group is to standardize a size- and load-time-efficient format and execution environment, allowing compilation to the web with consistent behavior across a variety of implementations.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>WebTransport Working Group</Name><Description>The mission of the WebTransport Working Group is to develop APIs that enable data transfer between browsers and servers with support for multiple data flows, unidirectional data flows, out-of-order delivery, variable reliability and pluggable protocols.</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Working Groups are the heart of the W3C Process. The W3C Team spends a certain amount of resources reviewing Submissions, running Workshops, and otherwise tracking Web developments, which culminates in the process of re-allocating W3C resources:1. The Director announces the development of a proposal for one or more new Working Group charters.2. Advisory Committee representatives review the proposed charters.3. The Director announces a decision to approve the group(s) (or otherwise), as proposed or with modifications suggested by reviewers.Working Groups and Interest Groups produce Recommendations and other technical reports, and sample code.More information about the role of Working Groups can be found in the Process document.</OtherInformation><Objective><Name/><Description/><Identifier>_5a594e7c-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator/><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Technologies &amp; Policies</Name><Description>Bring together people who wish to evaluate potential Web technologies and policies.</Description><Identifier>_5a594f3a-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>W3C Interest Groups</Name><Description>The primary goal of an Interest Group is to bring together people who wish to evaluate potential Web technologies and policies. An Interest Group is a forum for the exchange of ideas...There are currently 10 open Interest Groups.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Chinese Web Interest Group</Name><Description>The Chinese Web Interest Group provides a forum for W3C members to enhance the participation in Web standards work from the Chinese Web community.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Internationalization Interest Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Internationalization (I18n) Interest Group, part of the Internationalization Activity, is to help the Working Groups within the Internationalization Activity and provide a forum to discuss issues related to the internationalization of the Web.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Media and Entertainment Interest Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Media and Entertainment Interest Group is to provide a forum for media-related technical discussions to track progress of media features on the Web within W3C groups and use of Web technologies by external organizations, and to identify use cases and requirements that existing and/or new specifications need to meet to achieve a tighter support of media services on the Web.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Patents and Standards Interest Group</Name><Description>The Patent and Standards Interest Group (PSIG) is a forum for W3C Members and Invited Experts to discuss policy issues regarding the implementation of the W3C Patent Policy as well as new Patent-related questions that arise which require action or attention from the W3C Membership. The PSIG has no authority to create new policy. However, input from the PSIG on the operation of the policy and areas that might require further policy development by a W3C Working Group is welcome.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Privacy Interest Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Privacy Interest Group is to improve privacy on the Web by advising groups developing standards on how to avoid and mitigate privacy issues with their technologies. PING also suggests changes to existing standards and technologies to improve the privacy of existing systems. Finally, PING makes recommendations to the W3C Advisory Committee and the W3C TAG about whether a proposed standard would be beneficial or harmful for privacy on the web.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Spatial Data on the Web Interest Group</Name><Description>The Spatial Data on the Web Interest Group develops and maintains vocabularies and best practices that encourage better sharing of spatial data on the Web; and identify areas where standards should be developed jointly by both W3C and OGC.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>WAI Interest Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Web Accessibility Initiative Interest Group (WAI IG) is to provide a forum for review of deliverables under development by other WAI groups; for exploration of barriers to and potential solutions for accessibility of the Web; and for exchanging information about activities related to Web accessibility around the world.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web &amp; Networks Interest Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Web &amp; Networks Interest Group is to explore solutions for web applications to leverage network capabilities in order to achieve better performance and resources allocation, both on the device and network.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web of Things Interest Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Web of Things Interest Group is to counter the fragmentation of the Internet of Things by introducing a Web-based abstraction layer capable of interconnecting existing Internet of Things platforms and complementing available standards. We aim to reduce costs through the global reach of Web standards, to enable open markets of services, and to unleash the power of the network effect. As a W3C Interest Group, we are seeking to build a shared understanding of the Web of Things, and to identify opportunities for initiating standards track work within W3C working groups. Liaisons between W3C, industry alliances and standards development organizations are already in discussion for two critical areas: semantic interoperability and end-to-end security across different platforms.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Payment Security Interest Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Web Payment Security Interest Group is to enhance the security and interoperability of Web payments. The group pursues its mission by creating a forum for organizations to define areas of collaboration and identify gaps between existing technical specifications in order to increase compatibility among different technologies.</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>Interest Groups, like Working Groups, are the heart of the W3C Process. The W3C Team spends a certain amount of resources tracking Web developments, which culminates in the process of re-allocating W3C resources:1. The Director announces the development of a proposal for one or more new Interest Group charters.2. Advisory Committee representatives review the proposed charters.3. The Director announces a decision to approve the group(s) (or otherwise), as proposed or with modifications suggested by reviewers...Interest Groups do not publish Recommendation Track technical reports.More information about the role of Interest Groups can be found in the Process document.</OtherInformation><Objective><Name/><Description/><Identifier>_5a594fee-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator/><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Ideas</Name><Description>Socialize ideas for the Web at the W3C for possible future standardization. </Description><Identifier>_5a5950ac-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>W3C Community Groups</Name><Description>Community Groups enable anyone to socialize their ideas for the Web at the W3C for possible future standardization...There are currently 337 open Community Groups.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>3D FOSS Web Development Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Accessibility for Children Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Accessibility in India Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Accessible Infographics Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Accessible Online Learning Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Accessible Playlist Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Accessible SVG Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>ACT Rules Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Advancing Web Platform Application Testing Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>African Developers Taking on the Web Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Age Labels Data Model Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Agriculture Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>AI KR (Artificial Intelligence Knowledge Representation) Community Group</Name><Description>The overall goal/mission of this community group is to explore the requirements, best practices and implementation options for the conceptualization and specification of domain knowledge in AI.We plan to place particular emphasis on the identification and the representation of AI facets and various aspects (technology, legislation, ethics etc) with the purpose to facilitate knowledge exchange and reuse.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Algorithmic Modelling Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Annotation UX Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>AppsDesignLab Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Argument Representation Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Argumentation Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>ARIA and Assistive Technologies Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Art &amp; Culture (Museums) On The Web Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Atomic Data Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Audio Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Audio Description Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Augmented Reality Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Automotive Ontology Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>BD Comics Manga Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Benchmarking for the Web Community Group</Name><Description>As web "applications" become more complex, it is felt that not only conformance but also performance of software is at issue. This is especially true for those on embedded systems such as mobile terminals. This CG will discuss how to assess performance characteristics of web browsers and web applications and how to provide a method of comparing the performance of various subsystems across different web systems. The group will deliver guidelines on these issues.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Best Practices for Multilingual Linked Open Data Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Bibframe2Schema.org Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Big Data Community Group</Name><Description>This group will explore emerging BIG DATA pipelines and discuss the potential for developing standard architectures, Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), and languages that will improve interoperability, enable security, and lower the overall cost of BIG DATA solutions. The BIG DATA community group will also develop tools and methods that will enable: a) trust in BIG DATA solutions; b) standard techniques for operating on BIG DATA, and c) increased education and awareness of accuracy and uncertainties associated with applying emerging techniques to BIG DATA.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Big Data Europe Community Group</Name><Description>The group to discuss technical issues arising from the Big Data Europe Project.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Bioschemas for lifesciences Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Bitcoin Hypermedia Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Blockchain and Decentralized Apps Community Group</Name><Description>The group's mission is to discuss and eventually create and propose Web Specifications for creating and using Decentralized app (Dapp) on a Blockchain. The groups primary activities will be to start discussions with regards to use cases of Dapps on blockchains and identify the issues that we have now. Eventually, the group will publish technical thought papers on Dapps and eventually produce deliverables like sample codes, use cases, proof of concepts, etc. in order for this community group to become a W3C Working Group to propose technical specifications related to creating and using Dapps on Blockchains. The ideal members that should join this group are those who has skills in Web standards and have interests in Blockchain technologies especially in the creation Dapps on Blockchains.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Blockchain Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of the the Blockchain Community Group is to generate message format standards of Blockchain based on ISO20022 and to generate guidelines for usage of storage including torrent, public blockchain, private blockchain, side chain and CDN. This group will study and evaluate new technologies related to blockchain, and use cases such as interbank communications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Blockchain Digital Assets Community Group</Name><Description>The group's mission is to discuss and eventually create and propose Web Specifications for creating and using Digital Assets on a Blockchain. The groups primary activities will be to start discussions with regards to use cases of digital assets on blockchains and identify the issues that we have now. Eventually, the group will publish technical thought papers on Digital Assets on Blockchains and eventually produce deliverables like sample codes, use cases, proof of concepts, etc. in order for this community group to become a W3C Working Group to propose technical specifications related to creating and using Digital Assets on Blockchains. The ideal members that should join this group are those who has skills in Web standards and have interests in Blockchain technologies especially in the creation and using of digital assets on Blockchains.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Brazilian Publishing Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Bridging GraphQL and RDF Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Browser Extension Community Group</Name><Description>Problem: There is no cross browser standard for building browser extensions, which requires developers to create extensions for each browser individually. Proposal/Mission: The Browser Extension group will attempt to standardize extension package structure, API, portability etc., across browsers.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Browser Sync Community Group</Name><Description>The major browsers provide users with a means of synchronizing their data across browser instances, but the services behind that synchronization process are not controlled by users, and users don't have the ability to sync the data of their choice, or sync with other browsers. Our goal is to create a specification for a browser sync process that gives users more control over their data, gives developers the ability to sync specific data for their web applications, and allows for a diverse marketplace of sync backend providers.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Browsers and Robotics Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Building Device Naming Standards Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Bullet Chatting Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Business Data APIs and Interchange Community Group</Name><Description>Today, transmission of business data between software currently happens in the EDI format. This format is confusing, unreadable, and not publicly published. Many implementations are custom and involve high maintenance costs. The goal of this group is to define standards for transmission of various business data in a public, extensible, and humanly readable manner.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Cartography Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>ceddl html attribute-based markup and javascript api Community Group</Name><Description>A lightweigt html attribute-based markup and javascript api you used for surfacing digital data on a web application intended for web analytics, website personalization and DMP implementations. Applying lessons learnt by many implementations of Customer Experience Digital Data Layer (CEDDL) and bringing this back into a specification for the browser.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Chainpoint Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of this group is to establish a standard for creating a universally verifiable proof of any data, file, or series of events, by anchoring data to the blockchain and other sources. This allows anyone to prove the data existed at a point in time and has not been modified.The group will publish and formalize the Chainpoint specification as a stable reference, maintain a test suite, and take feedback and use cases for the future evolution for the specification.The Chainpoint Community Group will coordinate with the Blockchain Community Group for general standardization of blockchain-related technology, and will operate according to the Chainpoint CG charter. You can read more about Chainpoint, its history, and goals, on our recent blog post announcing Chainpoint 2.0.This group invites participants who are actively developing and deploying proof-of-existence, timestamping, and data integrity solutions, who are skilled in blockchain technologies, and who can work on use cases for Chainpoint and related technologies.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Change Tracking Markup Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of this group is to develop a proto-spec for marking up changes to documents.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Character Description Language Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Chemistry for the Web and Publishing Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Chinese Digital Publishing Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Chinese Web Accessibility Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Client and Server JavaScript APIs Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Cloud Computing Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Cognitive AI Community Group</Name><Description>The real world is frustratingly uncertain, incomplete and inconsistent. This is challenging for traditional approaches to information systems, and a new paradigm is needed that combines symbolic and statistical techniques, building upon decades of work in the cognitive sciences, and over 500 million years of natural selection. This will allow us to create cognitive agents that learn and reason based upon prior knowledge and past experience, and which can satisfy the need for, transparency in decision making, and continuous learning for adapting to ever changing needs. This community group will address opportunities for cognitive agents using graphs, statistics, rules and graph algorithms, starting with an amalgam of RDF and Property Graphs, together with Web architecture for cognitive databases.More specifically, the Cognitive AI Community Group will work on use cases and requirements, demo's, open source, and scaling experiments. For more details, see:* Cognitive AI CG GitHub Repository* Keynote on Cognitive AI for the 2020 Summer School on AI in Industry 4.0* An older talk on Cognitive AI and the Sentient Web* Longer treatise on Cognitive AI* Public mailing list archive* Contributing to the Cognitive AI Community Group</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Collaborative Software Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Collaborative Software Community Group is to provide a forum for experts in collaborative software and groupware for technical discussions, gathering use cases and requirements to align the existing formats, software, platforms, systems and technologies (e.g. wiki technology) with those used by the Open Web Platform. The goal is to ensure that the requirements of collaborative technology and groupware can be answered, when in scope, by the Recommendations published by W3C. This group is chartered to publish documents when doing so can enhance collaborative technology and groupware. The goal is to cooperate with relevant groups and to publish documents to ensure that the requirements of the collaborative software and groupware community are met.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Color on the Web Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Colour blindness accessibility Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Community Council</Name><Description>The mission of the Community Council is to promote Community and Business Groups and ensure that they function smoothly. The Council's activities include: documenting good community practices, reaching out to new communities, identifying opportunities for collaboration between groups, helping groups transition to the standards track if they so desire, and routine group maintenance. The Community Council will also discuss existing and new features and other ways to enhance the Community Group experience. Anyone may join the Community Council. In particular, W3C encourages Chairs of other Community and Business Groups to participate (e.g., in monthly meetings that will include W3C staff). This group will seek to make decisions when there is consensus and with due process.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Community I/O Community Group</Name><Description>This group will focus on applying current information technologies to create a foundation of infrastructure for organizing the flow of resources and support with services within human community. All peers (individuals or projects) can state their needs (input) and offers (output). Using Semantic Web, Federated Social Web and other related technologies people can develop various approaches of connecting those needs and offers. Including variants with and without use of currencies.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Consent on the Web Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of this group is to improve the experience of consent on the web while ensuring it remains adherent to relevant standards and laws. For this, the group will: (i) provide a space for people and stakeholders to come together (ii) highlight and analyse issues and problems about consent on the web (iii) propose and develop solutions. Some concrete areas for the working of this group are: (a) developing solutions using legal, or technical, or a combination of both; (b) documenting and achieving legal compliance; (c) improving the user experience; and (d) utilising existing and developing new web standards for consent.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Content Blocking Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Conversational Interfaces Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>CoVid-19 Remote Meet, Work, Class Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Credentials Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Credible Web Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of the W3C Credible Web Community Group is to help shift the Web toward more trustworthy content without increasing censorship or social division. We want users to be able to tell when content is reliable, accurate, and shared in good faith, and to help them steer away from deceptive content. At the same time, we affirm the need for users to find the content they want and to interact freely in the communities they choose. To balance any conflict between these goals, we are committed to providing technologies which keep end-users in control of their Web experience.The group's primary strategy involves data sharing on the Web, in the style of schema.org, using existing W3C data standards like JSON-LD. We believe significant progress toward our goals can be reached by properly specifying "credibility indicators", a vocabulary/schema for data about content and the surrounding ecosystem, which can help a person and/or machine decide whether a content item should be trusted.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Croatian Web Developers Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Cryptoledgers Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>CSS Accessibility Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>CSS Print Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>CSS Selectors as Fragment Identifiers Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>CSS4 Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>CSV on the Web Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Customer Experience Digital Data Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Data Driven Standards Community Group</Name><Description>The Data Driven Standards Community Group focuses on researching, analyzing and publicly documenting current usage patterns on the Internet. Inspired by the Microformats Process, the goal of this group is to enlighten standards development with real-world data. This group will collect and report data from large Web crawls, produce detailed reports on protocol usage across the Internet, document yearly changes in usage patterns and promote findings that demonstrate that the current direction of a particular specification should be changed based on publicly available data. All data, research, and analysis will be made publicly available to ensure the scientific rigor of the findings. The group will be a collection of search engine companies, academic researchers, hobbyists, protocol designers and specification editors in search of data that will guide the Internet toward a brighter future.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Data on the Web Best Practices Community Group</Name><Description>This group will continue the work started by the Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group in investigating topics such as data versioning, subsetting, data access and metadata. It will promote discussions about Data on the Web challenges and best practices, evaluating its benefits and any drawbacks. In so doing, the CG will collect new evidence of the DWBP implementation around the world and offer additional material that will help the adoption of the DWBP. Needs for further standardization will be identified.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Data Pipelining Use Cases Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Data Privacy Vocabularies and Controls Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Data Visualization Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>DataSheets Community Group</Name><Description>Decoupling content and data from HTML, by providing a DataSheet Language (CSS-like) to source, store and apply data to the HTML DOM. The browser will be able to take the responsibility of retrieving the data from a variety of sources and rendering it. The group will outline the language and the full specifications for making this a reality.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Decentralized Communications Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of this group is to specify and build a reference implementation of Decentralized Communications. Decentralized Communications enables natively inter-operable communication services that are able to trustfully use peer to peer connections without having to use central authorities or services. Decentralized Comms are inherently inter-operable without using standard protocols by using the Protocol on-the-fly concept, where the most appropriate protocol stack to be used, is selected and instantiated at run-time.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Decentralized Identity Korean Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Decentralized Sharing Community Group</Name><Description>The goal is to work on interoperable sharing between decentralized platforms. The idea is not to design the perfect protocol but find a consensus that would lead to an interoperable data exchange with sync capabilities, access control, discovery, etc.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Decisions and Decision-Making Community Group</Name><Description>The group will discuss and tentatively specify a format for representing decisions, i.e. decision information, so they can be used across diverse systems. Because of the great variety of applications and decision technologies, this format should focus on the generic, core components of decisions and decision-making information. Decisions are a source of information in themselves, i.e. each decision that is made is in itself a piece of information the may need to be stored, tracked, shared, combined and compared to other decisions. The same holds for information about the decision process. In particular, this group will discuss and study how Semantic Web technologies can facilitate the representation and sharing of decision information. Ultimately, the aim of the group is to study and develop technologies and methods to support better, rapid, and agile decision making.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Declarative 3D for the Web Architecture Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Declarative Linked Data Apps Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of this group is to produce a specification that describes how Web and Linked Data applications can be built using declarative technologies only, minimizing the need for source code. Current software development models involve writing source code (mostly in imperative languages) and building programs from it. Source code is prone to bugs, and managing it requires developers. The declarative approach is instead to push as much application logic from source code to data, so that the application can be managed and reused as data itself, while the software become generic and application-independent. This approach is related to functional languages and to processing pipelines. The generic software works as a processor: it takes the incoming request and the declarative application description and runs it through a pipeline, first retrieving the state of the requested resource (or changing it) and then rendering it into the requested format, such as a Web page. This is similar to an XSLT processor transforming XML documents. Graphity is a production-level platform for declarative end-user Linked Data applications with an RDF triplestore backend. It processes ontologies describing application structure, which seemlesly combine multiple declarative technolgies: URI templates, SPIN SPARQL templates, XSLT stylesheets (both server- and client-side), and RDF/POST encoding. Please join this group if you're interested in any practical or theoretical aspects of Linked Data, declarative technologies, or Graphity software.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Declarative WebVR Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Design Tokens Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Development Linked Data Community Group</Name><Description>Data is commonly considered as a new kind of fuel powering economical, cultural and societal changes. From e-governance to smart cities, many examples can be found to argue for the value of open and connected data. By turning the Web into a data publishing platform Linked Data is a key enabling technology for this. It has yet to be kept in mind that as of 2012 65% of the world does not have access to the Web and are thus deprived from Linked Data. Furthermore is this population sorely in need for the changes data-driven societies benefit from. This community group is there to discuss some important questions such as: * How can development related data be published as Linked Data? * What kind of data is out there and what is relevant to drive societal changes in underprivileged countries? * How can those without Web access can consume open data set published as Linked Open Data? * How can the Linked Data principles be revised to be applicable in Web-less contexts? This group will not publish Specifications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Digital Asset Management Industry Business Ontology Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Digital Identity Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of the W3C Digital Identity Community Group is to identify and resolve real world identity issues, to explore and build a more secure trusted digital identity ecosystem on internet for people, organizations and things fully controlling, protecting and expressing their identity. Our work focuses on the ecosystem's scalability, interoperability, mobility, security and privacy. We intend to integrate interoperable identity solutions, systems and networks in our ecosystem.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Digital ssset standard Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Distributed Compute Protocol Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Distributed Tasks Community Group</Name><Description>Common ground for people developing various collaboration software with notion of "tasks." Aiming for increasing interoperability across all such software and improving experience of a person contributing to big number of projects. Emphasis on interoperability, portability and extensibility!</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Distributed User Interfaces Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Do-Not-Track Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>E-learning: Evolving technologies and growing reach Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Educational and Occupational Credentials in schema.org Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Educational Exercises and Activities Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Efficient Extensible Interchange Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Electronic Governance (eGov) Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Electronic Governance Community Group (formerly W3C e-Government Interest Group) is to build and strengthen the community of people who actively develop, use or promote the use of W3C technologies to improve the working of government (Electronic Government) and its interactions with citizens, businesses, civil society and other arms of government (Electronic Governance). As a part of its activities, the Group will identify and discuss essential areas of technology, organizational and social change, and related policy issues. Such areas include but are not limited to: access and accessibility; cloud computing; data licensing; education and outreach; government as a platform; interoperability; information sharing; innovation and innovation transfer; impact, public value and economic evaluation; knowledge management; mobile government; open government; privacy, security and sensitive data; standardization versus adaptation; transparency and accountability; whole-of-government; and others. The discussions will occur, among other places, on the Group's mailing list, in teleconference seminars, and at face-to-face gatherings. On the topics with sufficient interest and motivated participants, the group will form task forces to produce technical documents and policy recommendations, reach out to relevant communities, and even encourage the formation of specialized EGOV-related community groups.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Emergency Information Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Enterprise Ethereum Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Entity Reconciliation Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>EPUB 3 Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>ETL Markup Language Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>EXPath Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of this group is to lead to extension of XPath and all related technologies (XSLT, XQuery, XProc, XForms, XML Schema).</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Experience API (xAPI) Vocabulary &amp; Semantic Interoperability Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>experimental protocols Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Exploration of Semantic Data Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Exposing and Linking Cultural Heritage data Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Exposing IEEE LOM metadata as Linked Data Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Extensible Data Model Declaration Language for Education Community Group</Name><Description>XDMDL is proposed as a high level schema language that will allow people to define, share, combine, reference and profile data models. The proposal has grown out of a requirement recognised within the education community working in the SCORM and xAPI traditions, and it is intended to pilot the specification by demonstrating how it can help improve data interoperability between software systems designed to manage and deliver learning activities.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Extensible Web Community Group</Name><Description>The Extensible Web Community Group is an incubator for web technologies enabling authors to extends the native web technologies via scripting (ie: shims &amp; polyfills).</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Federated Commerce Community Group</Name><Description>Decentralized e-commerce and storefront apps will more easily share and syndicate their products rather than relying on single and proprietary APIs from hosts to operate a storefront. By structuring portable commerce data stores, protocols, and semantics, this group seeks to enable marketplaces to be built more eaily and made more easily discoverable.This group's efforts will complement existing activities such as Web Payments, Linked Data, and DID, to deliver a search, browse, configure, checkout, and payment workflow for physical and digital products with mostly existing web technologies.At a higher-level, it would be potentially beneficial to include support for an aggregate query language, (such as SPARQL) to enable applications to query a known network of compatible applications for product information to better support web resource-to-web resource indexing and listing of products, increasing visibility without the need for central search engines. This would potentially utilize HTTP methods to register product catalogs in other web apps or request product catalogs from other web apps, enabling products to be purchased outside of the scope of the original commerce site, creating an aggregate marketing power across the web rather than depending on singular, monolithic e-commerce platforms.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Federated Identities for the Open Web Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of this group is to propose new APIs that allow for secure identity federation across domains on the open web.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Federated Infrastructures Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of this group is to create a set of upper ontologies to describe federated infrastructures and their resources. The ontologies will support a number of use cases to semantically manage the whole life cycle of a resource: discovery, selection, reservation, provisioning, monitoring, control, termination, authentication, authorization, and trustworthiness.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Film Industry Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Financial Industry Business Ontology Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Font and Text Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Functional Knowledge Graph Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Games Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Geospatial Semantic Web Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Getting Math onto Web Pages Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>GPU for the Web Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Haptic Interaction on the Web Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Hardware Based Secure Services Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Healthcare Schema Vocabulary Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>High-Performance Computing Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>HTML Editing APIs Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>HTML for email Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>HTML Tidy Advocacy Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>HTML5 Japanese Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>HTML5 Korean Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>HTML5 Specifications Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>HTTPS in Local Network Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Human Services Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Hydra Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Immersive Captions Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Immersive Web Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Inclusion and Diversity Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Inclusive Design for the Immersive Web Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Information Architecture Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of this group is to discuss, and share matters relating to the profession of Information Architecture. Help us spread awareness of Information Architecture and connect with other Information Architecture pros globally and locally. This group will not produce specifications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Interactive APIs Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Interledger Payments Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Interlinear Text Layout Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>JSON for Linking Data Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Knowledge Domain Community Group</Name><Description>Exploring effective architectural and best practices support for publishing content on, and author content for the web effectively expressing knowledge domain specific content according to standard practices in that knowledge domain discipline. By knowledge domain we mean such human disciplines as mathematics, physics, chemistry and other STEM disciplines. We also include disciplines such as music, economics, history and linguistics. We are particularly interested in disciplines that convey knowledge using discipline specific symbology which cannot currently gain effective communication through HTML. We further include domain specific markup systems as well as graphical representation such as SVG rendering.This group may publish Specifications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Knowledge Graph Construction Community Group</Name><Description>The overall goal of this community group is to support its participants into developing better methods for Knowledge Graphs construction. The Community Group will (i) study current Knowledge Graph construction methods and implementations, (ii) identify the corresponding requirements and issues that hinter broader Knowledge Graph construction, (iii) discuss use cases, (iv) formulate guidelines, best practices and test cases for Knowledge Graph construction, (v) develop methods, resources and tools for evaluating Knowledge Graphs construction, and in general (vi) continue the development of the W3C-recommended R2RML language beyond relational databases. The proposed Community Group could be instrumental to advance research, increase the level of education and awareness and enable learning and participation with respect to Knowledge Graph construction.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Law and Technology Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Law and Technology Community Group is to serve as a place for legal professionals and those interested in the law to share information on how current laws affect the implementation of new web technologies as well as how those new technologies can affect the law.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>LDP Next Community Group</Name><Description>LDP Next aims to continue the work started by the LDP Working Group. LDP Next hopes to address the following topics that were not covered by LDP 1.0: (1) extensibility and discovery — allow clients to easily discover server affordances; (2) inlining on GET and POST — allow clients to request and create multiple resource with a single HTTP request; (3) query / search over LDPCs and LDPRs; (4) access control — provide a mechanism to control access to Linked Data Platform Resources.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Linked Building Data Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Linked Data for Accessibility Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Linked Data for Language Technology Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Linked Data Models for Emotion and Sentiment Analysis Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Locations and Addresses Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Machine Learning for the Web Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Machine Learning for the Web Community Group (WebML CG) is to make Machine Learning a first-class web citizen by incubating and developing a dedicated low-level Web API for machine learning inference in the browser. Please see the charter for more information. The group invites browser engine developers, hardware vendors, web application developers, and the broader web community with interest in Machine Learning to participate.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Machine Learning Schema Community Group</Name><Description>This group represents a collaborative, community effort with a mission to develop, maintain, and promote standard schemas for data mining and machine learning algorithms, datasets, and experiments. Our target is a community agreed schema as a basis for ontology development projects, markup languages and data exchange standards; and an extension model for the schema in the area of data mining and machine learning. The goals of this group are: To define a simple shared schema of data mining/ machine learning (DM/ML) algorithms, datasets, and experiments that may be used in many different formats: XML, RDF, OWL, spreadsheet tables. Collect use cases from the academic community and industry Use this schema as a basis to align existing DM/ML ontologies and develop more specific ontologies with specific purposes/applications Prevent a proliferation of incompatible DM/ML ontologies Turn machine learning algorithms and results into linked open data Promote the use of this schema, including involving stakeholders like ML tool developers Apply for funding (e.g. EU COST, UK Research Councils, Horizon2020 Coordination and Support Actions) to organize workshops, and for dissemination</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Maps For HTML Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>MathML Refresh Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Meat Products Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Media Delivery Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Media Resource In-band Tracks Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Merging of Web and Mobile APP Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>MFX Media Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Microposts Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>MicroXML Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>MiniApps Ecosystem Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Mixed Reality Service Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Mobile Accessibility Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Mobile Web in Indian Languages Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Multi Markup Community Group</Name><Description>Web Service specifications and vocabularies are faced with the challenge of providing dual (or more) normative (or alternative) markups for their specifications or vocabularies. For example it is becoming common to require both an XML and JSON normative markup for documents and messages. This group will discuss options and propose practices for authoring and maintaining specifications and vocabularies in multiple markups. This may include, but not limited to, authoring in a 'meta markup' or automatic translation between markup formats.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Multi-device Timing Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM) Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Multilingual Web Sites Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Music Notation Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Native Web Apps Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Network Maintenance Notifications Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Network-Friendly App and WebApp Best Practices Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Networked Data Community Group</Name><Description>The recent years have shown the need to deal with networked data in large-scale, distributed settings. Not only must the systems be scalable, elastic and performant, but also address *ability (usability, manageability, etc.). One key component is doing it the webby way. The Web is the leading concrete exemplar of RESTful design, being the result of posthumous analysis of what was already working with URIs, HTTP and HTML for a system of interlinked documents. Unfortunately the machine equivalent of HTML is still emerging. LinkedData has achieved some powerful results; automated navigation by querying the Linked Open Data cloud shows some of the potential. However many systems also need to evolve and be evolved. This can be expressed as 'service capability' and also needs to be supported with consistency. This should aim to eliminate the wide range of non-interoperable approaches muddling the current landscape of REST APIs through exploiting hypermedia concepts. The Networked Data Community Group aims to provide a forum for collecting use cases including but not limited to the fields of science data (such as biology, astronomy, etc.), economics data (financial markets, etc.), health care, configuration and systems management, Green IT, and smart infrastructures (cities, etc.). Based on the collection of use cases the CG will derive requirements and write up best practices for dealing with the dynamics of the data.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Notation 3 (N3) Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>ODRL Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>OFF/X Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Ontology-Lexica Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Open and Interactive Widgets for STEM Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Open Annotation Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Open Data Directory Community Group</Name><Description>The Open Data Directory lists products, services and research projects that leverage Linked Data. Currently, the Directory serves as an aggregator of use cases and web sites using Linked Data and is expected to evolve over time in response user requirements. The Directory is a community service project to foster ease-of-use and awareness of Open Data on the Web. The Directory has an easy to use Web interface enabling users to list: - Organization name - Contact name - Product(s) - Service(s) - Projects &amp; Use Cases The Open Data Directory periodically gathers Linked Data from designated sites and compiles it into a summarized view of the community. It is a purely Linked Data application and not another "walled garden." Organizations are responsible for publishing their own Linked Data for the Directory to consume. The Open Data Directory includes some basic visualizations that are expected to expand over time. The site is built on open Web standards and an Open Source data platform hosted on the cloud. All of the data is freely available for download as RDF. The Open Data Directory is open and does not require W3C affiliation.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Open Data Nepal Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Open Data Spain Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Open Educational Resources Schema Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Open Government Community Group</Name><Description>This group's mission is to discuss and prepare data and API specifications relating to open government information, which may include: * people, such as legislators * organizations, such as legislatures or committees * people's positions within organizations * areas, such as electoral districts * events, such as elections * documents, such as bills or agendas * speeches, such as those given by legislators in legislatures * votes The group will base its work on existing standards as much as possible, and re-use existing terms (classes and properties) wherever appropriate. The group may define various serializations of the specifications, including but not limited to RDF and JSON. The group will seek consensus around, and support for, these specifications which may then be brought to an appropriate Working Group to advance a specification from draft to standard. The group will coordinate as appropriate with the Web Schemas Task Force of the Semantic Web Interest Group and other relevant groups within the W3C.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Open knowledge-driven service-oriented system architectures and APIs (KiSS) Community Group</Name><Description>W3C provide a great variety of standards that can be used to build applications that use the Internet as a platform for communication and integration. The open Knowledge-driven Service-oriented System architectures and APIs (KiSS) community group is created for sharing, elaborating and evolving knowledge-driven approaches for system integration. The KiSS community group takes service-oriented architecture as a main paradigm for application creation. However, it is not enough to say that there is a set of some services that can be integrated according to the application needs. The integration is facilitated with semantic descriptions of the services. Furthermore, the special support components are required at system run time in order to allow dynamic composition of the services accordingly semantic representation of adjusted or new system goals. Thus, the community aims to categorise different possible architectures to allow knowledge-driven approach for system integration; it provides reference architectures that also point out possible technologies for the solution implementation. The community targets different application domains and industries in order to benefit from cross-domain vision on development of knowledge-driven systems. The abbreviation of the community group highlights the integrative nature of the group (small i among K (knowledge), S (service) and S (system)). The group is managed by 6 re-electable chairs.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Open Linked Education Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Open Science Community Group</Name><Description>Open Science has considered as a alternative of the entire research cycle to improve sustainable value of science. This group's goal is to develop various resource including documents and sources based on an existing knowledge (e.g. open access, open data, open source, etc.) for motivating and smooth landing on doing the open science. As a alternative of a existing scientific paradigm, this group is to introduce a general and standard filed guide for Open Science Research Cycle, to generate a logical alternative for conflict concern for open science, to provide a framework(or IDE) to implement the open science paradigm, and to develop meta data using existing knowledge (e.g. ontology, semantic web, machine learning)</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Open UI Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>OpenActive Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>OpenTrack Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>ORTC (Object Real-time Communications) Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>OWL: Experiences and Directions Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>PDF and Open Data Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Performing Arts Information Representation Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Permanent Identifier Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Philosophy of the Web Community Group</Name><Description>Many philosophical issues have arisen in the technical design of Web standards over the years. Philosophical conundrums sometimes seem out of context in the light of seemingly more pressing technical problems. Yet, the very fact that these philosophical problems are constantly raised indicates that they are not easily dispensed with, but should instead be the focus of serious and ongoing long-term discussions. This is why this CG aims at undertaking such discussions, even outsourcing them to alleviate the task of other groups. To clarify the goal of this CG: it should not be a place to do unconstrained philosophical research but rather a forum to examine issues arising from the W3C technical community. Open discussion and precise descriptions of the minutiae of the Web will help guide the work in the CG, which should output short guides on precise topics to help case progress and discussions in other groups. The PhiloWeb Community group aims to undertake such discussions by bringing together experts from the web and the philosophical community to help the task of "philosophical engineering", a term coined by Tim Berners-Lee.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Physical Ledger Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Places Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Positive Work Environment Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Print and Page Layout Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Privacy Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Private User Agent Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Property Graphs Model and API Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Publications Object Model Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Publishing Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Quick-fix support for XML Community Group</Name><Description>Sometimes an error reported against an XML document can be fixed automatically, for example if the error refers to an unexpected attribute then an automatic fix will be to delete that unexpected attribute. We want to explore the issues related to applying quick fixes (like preserving DOCTYPE declarations, entities, etc.) and determine what actions will be needed be able to apply quick fixes on a document as well as a representation language to describe these actions. Quick fixes are especially interesting when we use Schematron for XML validation, as in this case the quick-fix should be specified by the schema author, so we have user-defined quick fixes. Imagine for example a business rule implemented in Schematron that says that a list should contain between 4 and 8 items. If we determine that there are two items then a quick fix will propose to add automatically two more items to the list or if the list has 10 items then a quick fix may propose to delete two items or to split the list in two lists, etc.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>RDF and XML Interoperability Community Group</Name><Description>The goal of this group is to 1) identify application areas in which the combined processing of XML and RDF data and tooling is beneficial; 2) identify issues that hinder the joint usage of the two technology stacks 3) formulate best practices to resolve the issues or propose standardization topics. The goal does not only take into account the data representation formats XML and RDF, but all related technologies (e.g. for XML: XSLT, XQuery; for RDF: RDF Schema, SPARQL) and selected XML (e.g. OData) or RDF vocabularies. The group should be driven by needs of industries that already deploy one or both technology stacks. This will also cover adjacent technologies like JSON with respect to the topics covered in this group. The outcome should focus not on a big architecture of how to work with XML and RDF, but on small building blocks (as best practices or standardization topics) that can be re-used across industries and application scenarios.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>RDF JavaScript Libraries Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>RDF Stream Processing Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>RDF Test Suite Curation Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>RDF-DEV Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Read Write Web Community Group</Name><Description>The activity of this group is to apply Web standards to trusted read and write operations.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Research Object for Scholarly Communication Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Responsive Issues Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Restaurant Ontology Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Restricted Media Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Revising W3C Process Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Rights Automation for Market Data Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Robustness and Archiving Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Schema Architypes Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Schema Bib Extend Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Schema Course extension Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Schema Extensions for IoT Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Schema Generator Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Schema.org Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Schema.org for datasets Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Scholarly HTML Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Script Library Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>SDshare Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Second Screen Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Semantic Industries Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Semantic News Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Semantic Open Data Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Semantic Sensor Networks Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Semantic Statistics Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Semantic Web in Health Care and Life Sciences Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>SHACL Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Shape Expressions Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Silver Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>SKOS and OWL for Interoperabilty Community Group</Name><Description>Based on our #SDSVoc bar camp session we would like to discuss best practices for using SKOS and OWL for interoperability</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Smart Contracts Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Smart Manufacturing Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Smart Phone Application Developer Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Social Economy Community Group</Name><Description>In this group we work on various web technologies needed for managing all kinds of economic relationships between individuals and organizations. While recognizing nowadays dominance of commerce, we take here more general approach which gives equal attention to all kind of non-commercial approaches, including Social Economy, Sharing/Collaborative Economy, Solidarity Economy, Informal Economy etc.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Social Web Incubator Community Group</Name><Description>The purpose of the Social Web Incubator Community Group is to continue and extend the development of vocabularies, formats and protocols to support the distributed / federated social web, as well as related technologies (such as anti-abuse and anti-spam techniques suitable for an open web). This group continues the work of the W3C Social Web Working Group. As proposals gain support and become more stable and mature, they will be considered for migration to a W3C Working Group where they can be put on the Recommendation track with appropriate status and Intellectual Property (IP) considerations.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Solid Community Group</Name><Description>The Solid project aims to improve privacy and data ownership on the Web through a proposed set of conventions and tools for building decentralized social applications.The mission of the Solid Community Group is to try to reshape the web by fostering a new breed of applications with capabilities above and beyond anything that exists today. Participants in this group will create applications, author technical specifications, and capture best practices.Participants in this group who contribute to the Solid code base should also review the guidelines and best practices for contributing to the Solid project.This group will publish Specifications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>SPARQL 1.2 Community Group</Name><Description>The SPARQL 1.2 Community Group is a forum for discussion and refinement of SPARQL 1.1. It will document features found as extensions to available triple stores and also document common needs from the user community. The CG aims to create consensus and understanding of the impact of new features with special emphasis on features that leave existing SPARQL 1.1 queries and systems unchanged. The CG will build a collection of such features leading to a CG report on use cases and requirements.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>SPARQL Maintenance (EXISTS) Community Group</Name><Description>The "SPARQL Maintenance (EXISTS)" Community Group is a forum to discuss and address problems with the "EXISTS" feature in SPARQL 1.1. The SPARQL 1.1 suite of specifications and the SPARQL 1.1 test suite are frozen. A process exists to record errata and that will be one input to any working group chartered to revise SPARQL. In the meantime, SPARQL is being used in real-work systems in industry and public-sector. The user community expects a high degree of conformance across implementations. The EXISTS feature has been found to be problematic. This feature is used by the RDF Data Shapes Working Group. This community group will create CG Notes and accompanying test suites to describe one or more improvements with an emphasis on maintaining compatibility. This group is not producing specifications. Any tests produced by the will submitted to the RDF Test Suite Curation CG for long-term stewardship.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Speech API Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Sport Schema Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Stereoscopic 3D Web Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Stroke Fonts Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Sustainable Web Design Community Group</Name><Description>A community group dedicated to creating sustainable websites. This group will not publish specifications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>SVG Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>SVG glyphs for OpenType Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>SVG Mapping Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>SVG Streaming Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>svg-zh Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Synchronized Multimedia for Publications Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>syndicated.media Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Synthetic Media Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Talent Marketplace Signaling Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Technical Architecture Community Group</Name><Description>This group is an open forum for discussing Web architecture, such as that discussed by the W3C Technical Architecture Group (TAG). Web architecture refers to the underlying principles that should be adhered to by Web components (APIs/Markup), whether developed inside or outside W3C. The architecture captures principles that affect such things as understandability, interoperability, scalability, accessibility, and internationalization. We expect to have a strong working relationship with the W3C TAG.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Technical Documentation in the Semantic Web Community Group</Name><Description>The complexity of machines and software has grown dramatically in the past years. The technical documentation became a fundamental source for service technicians and professionals in their daily work. Fast and focused access methods are necessary to handle massive volumes of technical documents. Semantic technologies have proven their ability to improve accessibility of information (see Linked Open Data). However, existing corpora of technical documents are usually not semantically prepared. This group shall focus on applying semantic technologies to technical documentation. All peers (individuals or projects) can state their needs (input) and offers (output).</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>The Tourism Structured Web Data Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of this group is to discuss and prepare proposals, examples, and best practice guidance for the sharing, via the web, structured data descriptions of resources associated with the tourism industry. Initial focus will be on extending Schema.org schemas for the improved representation of tourism related information markup and sharing. The group will seek consensus around, and support for, proposal(s) to be made to the Schema.org community.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>The Unitive Web Community Group</Name><Description>Currently, there is a growing movement from the independence of the web, towards dominant companies. These companies offer organized information, but this comes at a price. We lose our independence more and more. The Unitive Web is a proposal to have both organized information and independence. It offers one generic approach closely compatible with the current web, which makes it possible to create a global open virtual space of information which is responsive and reliable. It offers open customization of user interaction, open bottom-up schema mapping, integration of (AI) algorithms, and facilitates in the protection of privacy. The aim of this group is to discuss any aspect of it and share specifications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Timed Text Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>TNS Blockchain Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Touch Events Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Traffic Event Ontology Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Trust &amp; Permissions Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>TV Control API Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Ubiquitous Application Design Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Unhosted Web Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Universal Images Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>User Identity on the Web Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>User Interaction and Experience Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Veres One Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Video Game Schema Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Virtual Reality website and Metaverse Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>VIVO Open Research Networking Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Vocabularies for big data analysis Community Group</Name><Description>This group discusses semantic ontologies for the Big Data space. It is supported initially by the H2020 Big Data Europe project. The mission of this group is to cooperate, discuss and agree on semantic vocabularies to support applications in the domain of big data processing. It is a conscious choice to initiate one forum to discuss and agree on various new vocabularies and/or their amendments. With this one group we hope to reach a broader public. The different ontologies have a common aim: describe tools such that they can be reused in semantic empowered applications for big data processing. At launch this will include ontologies for the Docker ecosystem and for Har-files. The former is used for setting up stacks in the Big Data Europe project, the latter for analysing HTTP requests.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Voice Assistant Standardisation Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Voice Interaction Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>VoiceXML Community Group</Name><Description>The mission of this group is to bring together voice application developers interested in VoiceXML. This group will not produce specifications, but will discuss use cases that may be recommended to the VoiceXML Working Group. Of particular interest will be use of VoiceXML for mobile applications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Volunteering Ontology Community Group</Name><Description>The Volunteering Ontology group seeks to provide the volunteering community with a shared vocabulary for the open exchange of data relating to volunteering. Entities of interest include volunteering opportunities, the organizations hosting those opportunities, and the volunteers themselves.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Voter Decision Support Community Group</Name><Description>This community group discusses voter decision support systems and related topics. This community group shall advance the theory and practice of decision-making software and decision support systems for use by citizens during voting-related and civic participation activities. This community group shall advance the theory and practice of voter-centric design, empowering and equipping citizens. This community group may draft suggestions and best practices and may coordinate with other groups to support pertinent standards.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>W3C Developer Relations Community Group</Name><Description>Developers and designers form an important audience for W3C standards, but the standards process itself is not an ideal way to engage with them. W3C has made strides in terms of developer relations in recent years, through W3Conf, Web Education XG and CG, easy access to W3C through community groups, more documentation, and online training. More can be done to reach more people and better reflect their interests in W3C. Initial ideas: * Create a developer relations activity or domain, to coordinate and explore different ways to directly engage with developers and designers, to gain early feedback on our specifications. * Make W3C a home for more useful documentation, demos, etc. * Support developer advocacy, in which ideas, use cases, and requirements for features or specification fixes are collected in detail from developers and designers, and presented to the appropriate W3C Groups. * Liaise with Members' developer relations departments on projects of mutual benefit. This group will not publish Specifications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>WAI-Engage: Web Accessibility Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Wearable Web Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web App Source Code Protection Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Application Store Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Archivability Community Group</Name><Description>Web Archivability is interested in proposing best practices that help the web developers and designers in building web site that can be easily captured, preserved, and replayed using the web archiving tools.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Audio Developers Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Bluetooth Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Certificate API Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Copyright Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Crypto API Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Dev Data Community Group</Name><Description>This group intends to analyse web development data from around the world and publish monthly reports. By leveraging open source tools, we hope to create an open source project to do this. This group does not plan to publish specifications that require patent commitments.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Education Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web fights covid19 Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web History Community Group</Name><Description>This group gathers people interested in the history of the World Wide Web: how it was invented, what was out there that made it possible, and what happened in its early years. Our main goal is to collect and preserve valuable information (software, documents, testimonials) before it is lost. This group will not produce specifications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Media API Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Media Text Tracks Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web NFC Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Observatory Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web of Sensors Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web of Things Community Group</Name><Description>The aim of the Web of Things Community Group (CG) is to accelerate the adoption of Web technologies as a basis for enabling services for the combination of the Internet of Things with rich descriptions of things and the context in which they are used.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Payments and Commerce Accessibility Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Payments Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Performance Community Group</Name><Description>The goal of the Web Performance is to produce a general guideline to help people who work in the web field increasing their websites' performances. From the server abilities and rapidity to the analysis of the website's code (whatever would the markup language be), we try to help web designers making faster websites.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Platform Incubator Community Group</Name><Description>The Web Platform Incubator Community Group (WICG) provides a lightweight venue for proposing and discussing new web platform features.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Skill Profiles Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Thing Protocol Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web Video Map Tracks (WebVMT) Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web We Can Afford Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>WebAPI Discovery Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>WebApps UI Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>WebAssembly Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>WebAuthN Adoption Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>WebID Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Webize Everything Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>XForms Users Community Group</Name><Description>A group for XForms users to discuss the use of XForms and propose changes and additions to the markup.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>XML Error Recovery Community Group</Name><Description>This group's purpose is the discussion of applying error recovery parsing methods inspired from HTML to XML.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>XML Hypermedia Community Group</Name><Description>Discuss possible benefits and implications of adding hypermedia affordance components to the XML language. Specifically, but not limited to discussion of Bugzilla bug# 17659.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>XML Performance Community Group</Name><Description>The Mission of the XML Performance Community Group is to determine the requirements, use cases to get performance measurements of the whole XML technology stack. One of the goal is to be able to understand how XML (versus other technologies) could be used as ground to make efficient processing and identifies bottlenecks and features of this XML stack. One later goal will be to compare XML implementations among them. To do so, we might give hint on defining Efficient Profiles of existing Specifications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>XPath Next Community Group</Name><Description>Create a place for gathering requirement from existing user of XPath, potential user of XPath and research in this area</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>XProc Next Community Group</Name><Description>Create a place for gathering requirements from existing and potential users of XProc, research in this area, and for supporting and writing the community-driven effort to define an XProc 3.0 specification (formerly 1.1) .</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>XSLT Extensions Community Group</Name><Description>The group aims to agree extensions to the XSLT 3.0 Recommendation published on 8 June 2017, along with supporting changes to the other specifications (XPath, Functions and Operators) on which it depends.A preliminary proposal describing requirements for such extensions can be found in Michael Kay's Proposal for XSLT 4.0 published in the Proceedings of XML Prague 2020It is intended that the group will operate primarily by use of email and forums but may hold a face-to-face meeting to resolve issues prior to final publication of a specification.The group may publish specifications.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>zot protocol Community Group</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/><Objective><Name/><Description/><Identifier>_5a59516a-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator/><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Web Technology</Name><Description>Provide companies with access to the expertise and community needed to develop open Web technology.</Description><Identifier>_5a59521e-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>4</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>W3C Business Groups</Name><Description>Business Groups provide companies anywhere in the world with access to the expertise and community needed to develop open Web technology...There are currently 8 open Business Groups.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Automotive and Transportation Business Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Automotive and Transportation Group is to act as an incubator of ideas for standardization for connected vehicles and the broader transportation data space. It had produced some early draft specifications for making vehicle signals available in a browser runtime as a first class object. Those specifications were the basis for launching the W3C Automotive Working Group. The Auto Working Group has since changed to service specifications to expose signals in a broader range of computing environments and bringing this extremely useful telematics information to the cloud.Fuller description of current and evolving scope is in the charter.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Graph Standardization Business Group</Name><Description>The Graph Standardization Business Group will take the output from the recent W3C Graph Data Workshop and develop a strategy for how the work should move ahead. The things we will explore are:* What Use Cases are organizations trying to solve? What are the business needs that need to be addressed?* What are the possible areas of technical work that needs to be done in W3C and what organizations will support it?* Which other organizations does W3C need to work with to insure interoperability?</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Improving Web Advertising Business Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Improving Web Advertising Business Group is to identify areas where standards and changes in the Web itself can improve the ecosystem and experience for users, advertisers, publishers, distributors, ad networks, agencies and others, and to oversee liaison with existing Working Groups and to create new Working Groups as needed</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Merchant Business Group</Name><Description>The mission of the Merchant Business Group (“Merchant BG”) is to improve the Web for people and organisations that sell goods or services, or accept donations online. This includes both business-to-business (B2B) merchants, business-to-consumer (B2C) merchants as well as not-for-profit donation acceptors. In this non-technical forum, participants will discuss merchant challenges, how emerging Web technologies could help address them, and what additional Web capabilities may be necessary. </Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Publishing Business Group</Name><Description>The Publishing Business Group fosters ongoing participation by members of the publishing industry and overall publishing ecosystem in the development of the Web for publishing, and serves as a conduit for feedback between the publishing ecosystem and W3C. See the Publishing Business Group Charter for details.The Business Group maintains a separate “Working” Web site, which includes documents, like information on meetings, index for meeting minutes, and other working documents. There is also a separate wiki for BG members. Finally, if necessary or convenient, Google Documents can also be used; these are collected in a separate Google Drive folder.(The Working Web site’s content is actually served from a dedicated Github repository.)</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web and Broadcasting Business Group</Name><Description>The aim of the Web and Broadcasting Business Group is to study and clarify the influence of Open Web Platform on the professional world of broadcasting, and to help stakeholders within the broadcasting industry to build good and practical understanding on the standardization processes in W3C with the chair-to-chair communication mechanism built into business groups. The business group will create monthly or bi-monthly report to summarize their study on the influence and share the reports internally. Detailed discussion and analysis on the use cases in this area should be done in the Web and TV Interest Group, so the business group will not deal with those items to avoid scope overlap. However, fruitful collaborative works may happen as a result of the chair-to-chair communication between these two groups.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web-based Signage Business Group</Name><Description>The Web-based Signage Business Group is aimed at companies and organizations interested in the standardization of Web based digital signage. The goal of the group is to identify use cases and system image/model for expansion of web browser based digital signage and smarter integration of existing Web standards.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Web5G Based Communications Accessibility Business Group</Name><Description>Discussion communications accessibility based on Web5G and AI.The purpose is to collect information on accessibility issues and implement the communications accessibility between normal people and disabled people, natives and foreigners, people and robots.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>Companies</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>W3C Working Groups</Name><Description>New W3C Working Groups can then build mature Web standards on top of best of the experimental work, and businesses and other organizations can make the most out of W3C's Open Web Platform in their domain of interest.</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>W3C has created Community and Business Groups to meet the needs of a growing community of Web stakeholders. Community Groups enable anyone to socialize their ideas for the Web at the W3C for possible future standardization. Business Groups provide companies anywhere in the world with access to the expertise and community needed to develop open Web technology. New W3C Working Groups can then build mature Web standards on top of best of the experimental work, and businesses and other organizations can make the most out of W3C's Open Web Platform in their domain of interest.</OtherInformation><Objective><Name/><Description/><Identifier>_5a5952e6-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator/><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Web Architecture</Name><Description>Document and build consensus around principles of Web architecture.</Description><Identifier>_5a595458-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>5</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>W3C Technical Architecture Group (TAG)</Name><Description>W3C created the TAG to document and build consensus around principles of Web architecture and to interpret and clarify these principles when necessary. The TAG also helps to resolve issues involving general Web architecture brought to the TAG, and helps coordinate cross-technology architecture developments inside and outside W3C. Some TAG Participants are elected by by the W3C Members, others are appointed by the W3C Director.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Daniel Appelquist</Name><Description>Co-Chair</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Tim Berners-Lee</Name><Description>Co-Chair</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Peter Linss</Name><Description>Co-Chair</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Yves Lafon</Name><Description>Staff Contact - W3C</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Daniel Appelquist</Name><Description>Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Rossen Atanassov</Name><Description>Microsoft Corporation</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>David Baron</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Hadley Beeman</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Alice Boxhall</Name><Description>Google, Inc.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Kenneth Christiansen</Name><Description>Intel Corporation</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Sangwhan Moon</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Theresa O'Connor</Name><Description>Apple, Inc.</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation>The TAG is a special working group within the W3C, chartered (under the W3C Process Document) with stewardship of the Web architecture.As outlined in its charter, there are three aspects to this mission:</OtherInformation><Objective><Name>Principles</Name><Description>Document and build consensus around principles of Web architecture and to interpret and clarify these principles when necessary</Description><Identifier>_5a595570-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>5.1</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Issues</Name><Description>Resolve issues involving general Web architecture brought to the TAG</Description><Identifier>_5a595674-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>5.2</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective><Objective><Name>Coordination</Name><Description>Coordinate cross-technology architecture developments inside and outside W3C</Description><Identifier>_5a595764-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>5.3</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal><Goal><Name>Guidance</Name><Description>Provides guidance on issues of strategy, management, legal matters, process, and conflict resolution.</Description><Identifier>_5a59584a-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator>6</SequenceIndicator><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Generic_Group"><Name>W3C Advisory Board (AB)</Name><Description>The Advisory Board provides ongoing guidance to the Team on issues of strategy, management, legal matters, process, and conflict resolution. The Advisory Board also serves the Members by tracking issues raised between Advisory Committee meetings, soliciting Member comments on such issues, and proposing actions to resolve these issues. The Advisory Board manages the evolution of the Process Document. AB Participants are elected by the W3C Members.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Jeff Jaffe</Name><Description>Chair - W3C</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Ralph Swick</Name><Description>Staff Contact - W3C</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Tantek Çelik</Name><Description>Mozilla Foundation</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Elika Etemad</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Tatsuya Igarashi</Name><Description>Sony Corporation</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Florian Rivoal</Name><Description/></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Wendy Seltzer</Name><Description>W3C</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Tzviya Siegman</Name><Description>Wiley</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>David Singer</Name><Description>Apple, Inc.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Avneesh Singh</Name><Description>DAISY Consortium</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Eric Siow</Name><Description>Intel Corporation</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Léonie Watson</Name><Description>TetraLogical</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Chris Wilson</Name><Description>Google, Inc.</Description></Stakeholder><Stakeholder StakeholderTypeType="Person"><Name>Hongru (Judy) Zhu</Name><Description>Alibaba Group</Description></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/><Objective><Name/><Description/><Identifier>_5a595980-fce8-11ea-a46f-2f432d83ea00</Identifier><SequenceIndicator/><Stakeholder><Name/><Description/></Stakeholder><OtherInformation/></Objective></Goal></StrategicPlanCore><AdministrativeInformation><StartDate/><EndDate/><PublicationDate>2020-09-22</PublicationDate><Source>https://www.w3.org/groups/</Source><Submitter><GivenName>Owen</GivenName><Surname>Ambur</Surname><PhoneNumber/><EmailAddress>Owen.Ambur@verizon.net</EmailAddress></Submitter></AdministrativeInformation></PerformancePlanOrReport>
